No, I am not a perfect creature that is always good, I am human after all, but it is a huge difference between making errors or overreacting on stress situations and a egomaniac and narcissistic sociopath at the level of Johnny Silverhand. Oh, and he is a damn mind raping parasite, holding the player character hostage, but I am sure having that in your head gives depths to the character too.
DarkMetatron
You will unravel more of Johnnyโs history which explains to some extent why he is such a douchebag. You know like in real life, even the biggest douchebags have something good in them and life has turned them into one.
Yeah, I had my fair share of douchebag interactions in real life, none of them were positive in any way, and I don't want to play a douchebag (thats why I stopped playing Witcher 3) nor want I help a douchebag. And for sure I have no intention of giving a douchebag some redemption arc. Nobody has to be a douchebag, it is always a choice someone willingly makes and sorry but I have the scars on my body and soul to show that nothing in them can ever by good, if they had good in them they would not be douchebags.
Oh, at the end of the DLC? No, sorry but I will not buy a DLC for a game that I don't even want to play the base version from.
Yeah maybe he will be a great mind parasite at the end, I don't know because I have no reason to dig through hours of shit to find a tiny golden Johnny core. That is not what I see as fun .
Cyberpunk is a fun game, but for me it is very shallow and I don't like Johnny Silverhand, every second where he is on screen is pure annoyance. And yes, I know that he is supposed to be like that, but for me it just killed the fun.
I finished maybe 25% and then just stopped playing.
The issue with "talking Wayland directly" is that Wayland as a definitive entity that all Wayland hypervisors understand or can run doesn't exist. Wayland has a very tiny base library and everything else is implemented by the specific running hypervisor. And those can do things under the hood very differently to each other, with APIs that can be mostly compatible but differ in small details. So when you "talk Wayland directly" you have to say "this only runs on proton and hyperland but not sway and Mutter, but maybe on Weston" (just an example for a sentence) because that's what you have tested and found that it works with your implementation or you have to implement all the different ways in which the Wayland implementations do their things (and maybe implement workarounds if one of them doesn't implement a specific function (like HDR support or fractional scaling) at all. "Talking Wayland directly" is a huge pile of very basic level stuff that you have to implement and maintain and keep track of to change in case one of the implementations changes something in a newer version that is incompatible to your code oh and better implement it in a way so you are still compatible with the old code too because that will be in use for the next 100 years on Debian.
There is a very good reason to use a framework that handles all that stuff and provides the stable API and functions that the display manager should provide (and what it did with X for decades).
There is no pre SNES Mario Kart era, the first Mario Kart was for the SNES..
It is possible to run code directly inside PDF files, as can be seen with Doom or Linux running inside a PDF file https://github.com/ading2210/linuxpdf
In addition to that can PDF files prepared to trigger security weaknesses and exploits in PDF readers (often Acrobat Reader), to act as an attack vector and run malicious code.
So no, PDF are not safe by design.
It gets even worse, I more and more see the use of NeoRetro when "Games that looks and feel old" are referenced. We already have words for that, but the gaming scene seems to be fixated on the word Retro alone.
If keeping body parts is a sign of neurodivergence then lots of religious people are neurodivergent. Having body parts (finger, bones, organs) from holy people or saints as relics is extremely common.
But that is hardly Waylands fault, be angry about Nvidia for having bare to none Linux support for decades.
I never said that everyone should drop the game and stop to like it. What I said was my opinion about the game, and opinions are personal. I am very sorry that my opinion is not to your liking, but I am still free to have it and to tell others about it.
I can understand that you want to defend the game that you like so much, I did the same thing month ago for Starfield (a game that for me is great and that I love to play, people and what they like are different and confusing ๐คฃ) until I came to the conclusion that there are better things to fight for then some dumb online discussions about a game.
I am happy that you (and 95% on Steam) like the game and have fun with it, unfortunately it is incompatible with me.