DaseinPickle

joined 1 year ago
[–] DaseinPickle@leminal.space 2 points 4 months ago

Yea, it’s still a work in progress for sure. And it seems that their focus is mainly to get the architecture stable and secure rather than focusing on end user experience. But personally I’m impressed with the dedication to make a secure and private messenger.

[–] DaseinPickle@leminal.space 4 points 4 months ago (2 children)

SimpleXchat doesn’t seem to get a lot of love. Open source, European, encrypted and very privacy focused.

[–] DaseinPickle@leminal.space 8 points 4 months ago (8 children)

Det er vildt at se hvor meget folk vil finde sig i. Der er jo alternativer.

[–] DaseinPickle@leminal.space 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Because you are making the tired old authoritarian argument that democracy is slow, and therefore it’s better to create hierarchical organisations with some benevolent dictators. And I believe that power always corrupts so it’s not a good solution. You believe some different so we will never agree.

[–] DaseinPickle@leminal.space 10 points 4 months ago

Der er ingen skam i at blive klogere. Det er godt at digitaliseringsnaiviteten er på retræte.

[–] DaseinPickle@leminal.space 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

True. Take a look at SimplexChat. It has a distributed architecture and allow people to host their own servers. Might be a good backup, if Signal should ever go down.

[–] DaseinPickle@leminal.space 3 points 4 months ago (3 children)

You don’t have to have everybody worry about owner duty. Cooperatives doesn’t have to be tiny organisations. You can have full time employees and so on: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Danish_cooperative_movement

[–] DaseinPickle@leminal.space 8 points 4 months ago (3 children)

Probably. But it shouldn’t matter. Their architecture assume the server is hostile.

[–] DaseinPickle@leminal.space 3 points 4 months ago (5 children)

You’ll never be able to compete with mega corps that can scale and sell your data, in order to provide a service for free. Price will never be the selling point of a more democratic web.

[–] DaseinPickle@leminal.space 3 points 4 months ago (7 children)

Why would it have to be cheaper? I’m not going to make a list. It’s a normal form of organisation in my country. For example my whole apartment complex is owned by the people who live there. We vote on what we want to pay in rent and how we want to spent the money.

And the same can be done with data coops. Here is one: https://data.coop/

There are others, with other values.

[–] DaseinPickle@leminal.space 5 points 4 months ago (9 children)

In my country a coop is a legal entity and it does give you actual ownership. And we do have data coops where people pay, and vote on how services should be developed.

[–] DaseinPickle@leminal.space 19 points 4 months ago (13 children)

Non profit coops. It need to be people owned.

view more: ‹ prev next ›