Draces

It's in the article

You might say capitalism necessitates corruption

Salt the earth

Ad hominem: (of an argument or reaction) directed against a person rather than the position they are maintaining.

Similarly arguing under the influence is a no no.

Funny enough, I have a literal poster beside me with the definition

I don't doubt that for a second. You clearly don't absorb information in front of you

Now that’s an Ad Hominem!

That's me trying to reason how you can possibly be this consistently ignorant, it's not my argument in the way you trying to say "you're just stoned so you're argument isn't valid". Read your poster.

Once again I raised JFK out of nowhere

You can't be serious. Do you even know what a strawman is? You weren't imposing that on someone's argument when you did. How can you not see how fundamentally different that is?

I’ll raise Trump a thousand more times if it pisses you off this much with glee

Go for it, I'll agree with it if when it fits the context. I hate Trump. I hate strawman arguments even more and I'm disappointed in this echo chamber that enables you

I will graciously oblige you with the final response. You’ll need it.

God damn school must have been rough on you edge lord

Yeah Trump would’ve definitely botched the crisis

Yeah Trump would’ve definitely botched the crisis, but no one was talking about him. I don't understand how you can be so embarrassing ignorant. Like, you're devastating to have on your side in an argument. You brought him up out of nowhere as a strawman

Similarly arguing under the influence is a no no.

Look up the definition of ad hominem bud cause you clearly fundamentally don't understand what you're doing. You can't discredit an argument by attacking the speaker no matter how hard you try, it's a fallacy. You can absolutely argue in any state you want and if the argument has merit it has merit.

let’s get back to the point

Jesus Christ you are just too fucking stupid to know what's going on. I'm having a hard time believing you're real right now. Once again my entire point is that you brought Trump up out of nowhere. What isn't subjective. And that being a straw man is also not subjective. The point is not subjective. You're so fucking weird.

Still triggered about the mention of Trump

Literally my whole point is you brought it up out of nowhere and you're embarrassing behavior doubling down in hilarious. I have nothing to say about geo politics in this thread. I'm staying on topic here.

Are you afraid of weed or something? I don't smoke much and some of the smartest engineers I know smoke a ton. That's a really weird ad hominem that doesn't even make sense

Hahaha can't figure typos out now? See I'm not worried about making a small mistake, like bringing Trump up out of no where and claiming "no ackshually it's you that's triggered". Oh man I'm starting to feel bad for you. You probably got bullied and picked on a lot. Honestly dude, you were wrong on that one point and it's ok to admit it. Like I'm admitting my auto correct turned into contact not contrast. Doubling down like this is just so embarrassing and gives me the worst kind of satisfaction to make fun of

Lmao feel free to check my profile. I'm sure I don't agree with that guy on a lot but thinking you're embarrassing is pretty universal 🤣

While you were learning about history @lennybird@lemmy.world studied the blade

Perfectly relevant to compare and contrast two presidents

It's not relevant to compare and contrast presidents no one's defending. See, that's the straw man. I'm not a high schooler but I'm pretty sure one could figure that out