I've always suspected it as a bad choice, it was my mainstay for a chromium-fork in a pinch at best.
But am curious how vivaldi truly compares in terms of privacy and general trustworthiness legacy
FailBetter
I keep running into this same deadend in my attempts to maintain decent digital hygiene. I'm always in the need to do more research before trying, but there's no way to pretend I've gone through every code line and audit either. Ultimately I'm always left with whatever solutions are most suggested--recurring suggestions becomes my true filter/litmus test but I know this itself is soon to become it's own non-solution.
I hear good things ab samsung too, but the common complaint about the extra bloat has kept me away for some time now
crap-hardware, or did they goof on the software side?
what are the first two?
Why doesn't anything like this exist for windows 11?
I did watch it, but struggle to see the relation still sorry
bmarked, arigatto!
Almost never honestly
The situation does seem quite desperate. I'd like to heed your call. Please advise on most critical systems I should have ready right now today please. I know have a lot of work to do and must stay efficient
Ok, I guess it doesn't carry across cult spectrums, but isn't that almost the rule for cults?
It's also recommended on privacyguides.org whereas vivaldi doesn't seem as foss as brave
Is it allowable with the privacyguides settings for foss-support-reasons or should we still avoid?
I gotta have some kinda librewolf alternative for compatibility-sake