Francisco

joined 2 years ago
[–] Francisco@mander.xyz 2 points 8 months ago

Great summary, thanks!

Despite the great images of IO the linked article comes with this mud pearl "[University of Arizona's Large Binocular Telescope] With two primary mirrors measuring 8.4 m (~27.5 ft), it has a collecting area slightly greater than that of a 30-meter (98.4 ft) telescope."

[–] Francisco@mander.xyz 2 points 10 months ago

Original sketches for the drinking scene on the Predator movie.

[–] Francisco@mander.xyz 6 points 1 year ago

A -190°C liquid nitrogen tank.. how long did it take to boil off?

[–] Francisco@mander.xyz 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

according to Science in Poland.

A cross from the 15th century.

Was Poland not widely Christian by that time?

[–] Francisco@mander.xyz 1 points 1 year ago
1
submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by Francisco@mander.xyz to c/bugs@lemmy.world
 

Found it on my tomato plant. I'd seen them before in sizes up to 4-5 cm. They eat the tomato leaves like crazy. And (naturally) poo a lot. Some black granade like aggregates. Once grown they molt into a moth that I saw a few days ago. And now my tomato plants are again riddled with these buggers.

This photo was done with the help of a stereoscope. The grid squares are 4mm inside, and 5mm outside the lines. So this juvenile has about 1cm.

I'd love to ID them. Any advise on how to control them without pesticides is also welcome.

[–] Francisco@mander.xyz 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Thanks for your answers and perspective, trully. Even if none of us have changed their opinion.

I see adjectivation and categorization as parts of reasoning. I think you used a red herring in order to have a strong opinion about it. With the same cheakyness, I'll quote yourself

I can't say whether this is an important issue, because I don't have any experience in this area.

I take issue

[–] Francisco@mander.xyz 1 points 2 years ago (3 children)

You feel free to use expressions and terms as "rub me the wrong way", "buzzwords", and "clickbait". In those cases you are okay with the listener/reader interpreting the implicit meaning over their explicit wording. Why is "forever chemicals" different? Specially in an informal communication setting.

[–] Francisco@mander.xyz 1 points 2 years ago (5 children)

What would you consider as okay to mention as 'forever chemicals'?