FreedomAdvocate

joined 2 weeks ago
[–] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 0 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (6 children)

Criminal charges was probably the wrong word, but that’s being pedantic. The company operates in Turkey and allows Turkish people to use the product, so they have to follow Turkish laws. The Turkish government can file legal charges against them for failure to comply. Same with any fediverse instance owners - they would either have to block their instance from all Turkish users, or comply.

[–] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au -1 points 2 days ago (6 children)

The context is extremely important in this one. It changes the sentiment from “Musk is censoring the political opposition because he supports the government” to “Musk complied with the legal demands so as to not have to remove X from the entire country of Turkey, and is fighting the demands in court as he says they are censorship”.

X is now notoriously law abiding, but also notorious for fighting against government ordered censorship in court. They comply with legal orders so as to not face legal trouble, and then file legal challenges - even going so far as to pay for and help with legal challenges for individuals who the government are censoring.

There are many good keyboards for iPads and Android tablets, especially since they support Bluetooth.

How are the OS’s garbage for reading and writing?

[–] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au -1 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Autopilot and FSD are completely different things.

FSD (Supervised) is not for situations where there is no driver - it’s for situations where the driver wants to just supervise while the car drives itself.

Where is this confusion around FSD and autopilot coming from all of a sudden?

[–] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au -2 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Least qualified? She’s a former prosecutor.

[–] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

“Fox News host and former prosecutor Jeanine Pirro” just doesn’t have the same outrage grabbing ring to it, does it?

[–] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au -2 points 3 days ago (4 children)

They took the stabbing videos down in Australia. They fought against removing them from the rest of the world saying that the Australian “safety commissioner” doesn’t have the jurisdiction to do that.

[–] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au -4 points 3 days ago

Ah the BS JerryRigEverything “towing” test. Of course people on here believe that was a problem for the cybertruck.

[–] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au -1 points 3 days ago

Any info on this? All I can find is that they would publish info on how many requests etc they go, not that they would fight them rather than comply.

Since they were never taken offline or banned in countries I’m assuming they didn’t fight very hard?

I’ve had no problem doing that on Android. Cut and paste work just fine.

[–] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au -2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

You’re like one of the people who complains that all they see on X is porn, not knowing that what you’re saying is that you regularly searched for porn in the first place to the point where “the algorithm” learns that’s what they want to see so keeps feeding it to them.

The rest of us have never seen any porn, or Nazi shit, on X.

[–] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au -2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (5 children)

Bluesky blocked his account in turkey btw, just like X did. Bluesky have made no mention of challenging the legal request in court like X have though.

Iirc the Brazil situation was the first time anything like this had happened since Musk bought Twitter. They definitely didn’t handle it correctly, but they’ve clearly learned since then. Now they comply with legal requests and challenge them through the courts. Would you prefer they just folded every time and didn’t challenge, like all the others? Like Bluesky?

Good work on calling me a nazi though! I did nazi that coming!!

view more: ‹ prev next ›