GameGod

yooo, I was just playing T2 in the pickup game on Friday night a few weeks ago. It's still so good!

You opened the door by making the comparison with Hetzner. What rationale is there to an 8 business day response to a new sign up? They're not running a police background check, lol. If you don't want fraud, you take a credit card up front and preauth it. It just tells me they're not serious about business and it tells me that if something goes wrong with my services with them, I can expect no response for a week. It's a ridiculous way to do business, and I can't imagine trusting them with anything I cared about because of that.

Equinix is legit and Xenyth's actual offerings and the way they write about their network + colo is what made me consider them in the first place, because they do seem competent. But if they're not paying attention to sales leads, and they're trying to compete with AWS/GCloud/Azure, good luck...

Yeah, but Hetzner's physical address on their website isn't a PO box...

I signed for Xenyth a couple months ago and it took them 8 business days from the time that I signed up, to the time that they "approved" my account and I could log in and provision services. I can't imagine this company will still be around in a few years.

Honestly, this entire thread is depressing. None of these companies compete with US or European cloud providers. They either have websites designed in 1992, are IT service companies masquerading as PaaS, seem to be poorly run, or their pricing is terrible.

Wrapping up this thread, I really appreciate all the opinions and experiences everyone shared! Gave me lots of new perspectives to think about.

Yeah, this might be the way to go. OpenWRT supports hardware NAT with many of these ARM-based routers like many of the MediaTek-based ones, which gives them super high throughput at very low CPU usage. The efficiency blows x86 out of the water. The ability to migrate your OpenWRT config to new hardware (real or virtual) in the future means you kinda get the best of both worlds....

Do not use an SSD for cold storage - it will fail. SSDs need to be plugged in every once to refresh the charge in their NAND, otherwise they'll lose the data.

This is not a theoretical thing - I've had a good Samsung 850 Pro drive fail while being off for 2 years.

Thanks, this is good data!

How fast is your internet?

Do a speed test and run htop... you'll see CPU usage only on one core spiking. Not a big deal if your CPU can handle it, but the AMD GX-412TC in the APU2 I was using is too slow.

Even if the virtualized router is down, I'll still have access to the physical server over the network until the DHCP lease expires. The switch does the work of delivering my packets on the LAN, not the router.

Thanks for the tip about the pfSense limit. After running pfSense for like 8 years, my opinion is that is flush with features but overall, it's trash. Nobody, not even Netgate, understands how to configure limiters, queues, and QoS properly. The official documentation and all the guides on the internet are all contradictory and wrong. I did loads of testing and it worked somewhat, but never as well as it should have on paper (ie. I got ping spikes if I ran a bandwidth test simultaneously, which shouldn't happen.) I don't necessarily think OpenWRT is any better, but I know the Linux kernel has multithreaded PPPOE and I expect some modern basics like SQM to work properly in it.

The other thing to keep in mind is to pass through physical nics. Using just the vnics will potentially lead to security risks. That’s the reason I went back to physical fws.

I could throw an extra NIC in the server and pass it through, but what are the security risks of using the virtualized NICs? I'm just using virtio to share a dedicated bridge adapter with the router VM.