Lulzagna

joined 2 years ago
[–] Lulzagna@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Windows 7 was the last good a Windows

[–] Lulzagna@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] Lulzagna@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] Lulzagna@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

My Wayland is now in Technicolor, but it cost me a few shillings.

[–] Lulzagna@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

How was this your breaking point?

[–] Lulzagna@lemmy.world 10 points 2 weeks ago

"Allows" is sometimes used synonymously with "Enables"

[–] Lulzagna@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago

And if it's a medical related call, my heart is racing the whole day

[–] Lulzagna@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

Source?

There needs to be at least some evidence that the American subsidiary of tiktok broke data privacy laws

If they did, they'd be tried under those laws, not some new legislation that allows carte blanche banning without a trial. That should tell you everything you need to know about whether there's any proof of them breaking data privacy laws.

[–] Lulzagna@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

You act like citizens are being handed crack cocaine.

It's just videos. If you don't believe in people having free will to watch videos on the Internet, you don't believe in freedom.

[–] Lulzagna@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Okay, so shut down twitter, Facebook, Fox News, rebel News, etc. Oh, what's that? You only want to shut down platforms that you disagree with? So "poisoning minds" was just a false projection.

[–] Lulzagna@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Citizens should be free to choose which social media platforms there wish to use.

Companies are not free, which is why they must operate within the regulations and laws that protect consumers and the nation as a whole.

Banning TikTok only violates the freedom of citizens and does nothing to protect consumers or the nation. Your argument makes zero sense in this context.

view more: next ›