RandomGen1

joined 2 years ago
[–] RandomGen1@lemm.ee 23 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Do not use anti-zionism (OK) as a guise for your antisemitism (bad)

[–] RandomGen1@lemm.ee 6 points 2 weeks ago

Save 100% on it by pirating it (or simply not playing it at all)

[–] RandomGen1@lemm.ee 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I want to push back on this just a little. Clearly UM isn't the bastion of consistent good thought, but others that were maligned like return2ozma have been pretty consistent in what they post.

This is to say, "Great, one person is a fuckup. Why are we attributing this to the whole group?"

[–] RandomGen1@lemm.ee -3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I don't see how he's any more unelected than prime ministers who are voted on by their party. From my short wiki read it seems to work pretty similarly to that process

Yes that's definitely exactly what I said thank you. /s

I won't be engaging with you further, thanks.

[–] RandomGen1@lemm.ee -4 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (3 children)

I'll not directly list any because that would be a waste of both of our times (notably some directly listed in the forthcoming article), but here's a wikipedia article with some information about that. I'm picking wiki here because I have a feeling you won't immediately discard it as pro-china propaganda. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/State-owned_enterprises_of_China

If the workers own the state and the state owns the corporations, what practical difference does it make? In a sense: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/State_socialism

~~The logic here is the state apparently operates at the will of the people (high approval ratings and high participation) and is working to bring "common prosperity" by gaining more control over the privately owned economy and bringing io state (public) ownership~~

[–] RandomGen1@lemm.ee -3 points 2 months ago (5 children)

In industries that have been pulled into the public fold, sure. I'm calling them socialist In the same vein that you might still call most western countries capitalist despite having market regulations and some companies that are workers co-ops or use other socially owned frameworks. As long as they're solidly on this trajectory it seems silly to me to label it otherwise at this point just as it would be silly to call the us socialist for having a few employee owned businesses

[–] RandomGen1@lemm.ee -4 points 2 months ago (7 children)

You won't see me argue that China is communist, it's socialist as it stands now with the stated goal of becoming communist

[–] RandomGen1@lemm.ee -2 points 2 months ago (9 children)

I'd buy that line if China wasn't integrating those large businesses (albeit slowly) into the public sector, something the west is not doing, but rather moving to deregulate more and more (Thanks Trump! /s)

[–] RandomGen1@lemm.ee 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

No right to exist as a nation doesn't imply the death of every citizen

[–] RandomGen1@lemm.ee -4 points 2 months ago (12 children)

What makes you say they don't think it applies to the West? I don't follow your logic there.

[–] RandomGen1@lemm.ee 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)

It makes sense when you consider that it's an artistic choice and not one of necessity. He presumably likes the very overtly autotuned sound for one reason or another.

If you only autotune a little bit, it's quite difficult to impossible to tell that it's been used by ear alone. In order to get his signature autotune sound, you need to make it shift the input by a significant amount, so to get the correct note on the output that means you need to sing intentionally high or low of the intended output by some amount (you can probably change the tone by varying how far off you sing from the intended output).

[–] RandomGen1@lemm.ee 24 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I would suggest openRCT mainly for the improved support of modern hardware/resolutions and the qol updates

view more: next ›