SeaJ

joined 2 years ago
[–] SeaJ@lemm.ee 4 points 20 hours ago (4 children)

And most of them are garbage, obscure sites.

[–] SeaJ@lemm.ee 6 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

How is it going to balance if it does not have a fake cochlea? /s

[–] SeaJ@lemm.ee 1 points 1 day ago

It should have been the chairman of the board...

[–] SeaJ@lemm.ee 3 points 1 day ago

"Introduces" is not exactly news.

[–] SeaJ@lemm.ee 2 points 1 day ago

The guy was appointed by Obama. I fully expected a moron Trump judge.

[–] SeaJ@lemm.ee 32 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Seriously. WTF kind of ruling is this?

[–] SeaJ@lemm.ee -2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

There are not actually anymore crashes than usual. The one that killed 67 was big so there is a focus on them for a while. Same thing happened after the East Palestine train derailment. Not that deregulation (and Trump) hasn't fucked things up overall but there is not some sudden jump in crashes.

[–] SeaJ@lemm.ee 3 points 2 days ago

Don't worry. I'm sure Trump will ask Musk about what he has access to. /s

[–] SeaJ@lemm.ee 27 points 2 days ago (3 children)

The IRS brings in revenue. Not exactly efficient to remove them.

[–] SeaJ@lemm.ee 27 points 3 days ago (1 children)

He is a real states' rights advocate.

636
submitted 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) by SeaJ@lemm.ee to c/news@lemmy.world
 

Summary via ChatGPT

A Delaware judge invalidated Elon Musk's $56 billion Tesla pay package for a second time, citing undue influence and unfair terms set by Musk. Despite shareholder approval earlier this year, the court ruled the process failed to address governance concerns and transparency. The judge emphasized the board's failure to prove the compensation plan's fairness, suggesting alternative, reasonable payment options were possible. Tesla may appeal the decision or propose a new compensation plan.

 

It's unknown if demonstrating responsible handling actually keeps kids safe.

view more: next ›