I have not had any problems on my end. I do know that for encoding, there are some quality issues with AMF when comparing it against Nvidia and Intel at equivalent bitrates that was only resolved with the latest 90xx series, but for Jellyfin purposes it works perfectly fine.
I prefer AMD over Intel because for 3D acceleration, AMD wins hands down. I also like AMD CPUs over the absolute power-hungry heaters that are Intel CPUs because it allows me to use lower profile coolers and cheaper PSUs.
You most likely want graphics for initial install and troubleshooting (like when your NAS loses connection for example). I would recommend a 5600G instead. Nice little APU that works great with Jellyfin transcoding. It's what I have in my own DIY NAS.
I’m actually going the other way and building a proper server out of an ancient HP Proliant ML110 G2 that my dad gave me.
Haha, one of my top concerns at the beginning was form factor. I really could not find a decent 4-bay case at the time that wasn't super hard to build in or a full-blown ATX. I think the closest I found was a Jonsbo N2, but it doesn't give enough space for a decent cooler. What I ended up going with was total overkill, a NZXT H1 with a PCI-E NVMe expansion card that gave me 3 extra NVMe slots. So now I have a RAIDZ1 array made up 4x 4TB SSDs. The overall form factor is nice, but the performance is completely ridiculously overspecced. My rationale though is that the SSDs were cheap enough and I think they'll outlast a regular HDD. I was annoyed at how my WD Reds died within 3-4 years back when I was still using my QNAP.
Now that locally hosting AI models is becoming a thing, I am kinda regretting going small form factor because I can't cram GPUs in there. So now I am thinking maybe getting one of those 4-foot high small server cabinets and getting a few Sliger CX4170a's and just building full PCs. I would probably move my main PC into that rack as well. But this is all just thoughts. Budget wise it's a bit ridiculous, but one can dream!
Sufficient I suppose. Limited by the single USB 3 connection.
Dang, if they made an updated one with USB 4, that'd be sick. Heck, I wouldn't even mind if they had multiple USB connections coming out of the thing, I just like the form factor.
Interesting! I am assuming each drive shows up as an independent drive that you can raid up however you want in software? Man I was looking for something like this, but at the time I was building my NAS, I couldn't find something similar so I just decided to build a whole new machine with enough space to contain the drives themselves. Had I known, I might have gone with this and a NUC or something. How's the performance?
I feel like containers work just as well for the "blow it away" usecase though and it doesn't have the VM overhead.
Oh yeah. I bet you're feeling lucky you didn't switch to Synology given the recent drama where they're locking features down to their branded hard drives, which we all know are just up-charged drives from regular vendors.
What drive bay enclosure are you using btw and how does it connect to your Mac mini?
Never heard of dockge. I'll have to check it out! I've just been using podman and docker-compose scripts.
I think it's a samba limitation. Maybe NFS works well for that case.
I used to do that. I had a QNAP NAS and a small Intel NUC running Arch that would host all my services. I would just mount the NAS folders via Samba into the NUC. Problem is that services can't watch the filesystem for changes. If I add a video to my Jellyfin directory, Jellyfin won't automatically initiate a scan.
Nowadays, I just combine them into one. Just seems simpler that way.
If you're familiar with Linux, I highly recommend it. The flexibility is just great and you can setup whatever dashboards / management tools you need. No need to tie yourself to a specific solution IMHO.
If you're going with Docker containers, a lot of the NAS OSes just hold you back because they don't support all the options that Docker offers. You'll be fighting the system if you need to do any advanced Docker configuration.
It was this nasty Intel clock drift bug: https://forum.qnap.com/viewtopic.php?t=157459
Support was completely unresponsive and refused to do anything. Didn't even acknowledge the issue AFAIK. I tried to add the resistor but my copy of the NAS didn't expose the right pins so I couldn't even solder them on if I wanted to. Then I tried mounting my drives into another Linux machine, at which point I realized they were using some custom version of LVM that didn't work with standard Linux. I ended up having to buy a new QNAP NAS just to retrieve my data and then I returned it.
After that, I swore off proprietary NASes. If I can't easily retrieve data from perfectly good drives, it is an absolute no go.
When my QNAP finally died on me, I decided to build a DIY NAS and did consider some of the NAS OSes, but I ultimately decided that I really just wanted a regular Linux server. I always find the built-in app stores limiting and end up manually running Docker commands anyways so I don't feel like I ever take advantage of the OS features.
I just have an Arch box and several docker-compose files for my various self-hosting needs, and it's all stored on top of a ZFS RaidZ-1. The ZFS array does monthly scrubs and sends me an email with the results. Sometimes keeping it simple is the best option, but YMMV.
Some lab and manufacturing equipment are still stuck on incredibly old versions of Windows. However, the thought of those machines still touching the Internet to the point where it can be counted by these statistics is honestly terrifying.