Trouble

joined 1 month ago
[–] Trouble@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It’s your fault

[–] Trouble@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 week ago (2 children)
[–] Trouble@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 week ago

Can’t argue with monkeys

[–] Trouble@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 week ago

It’s the guise of customer service sure, yeah

[–] Trouble@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Given that it’s not solving the problem it was implemented to solve, there is something wrong with it. AI is garbage, you can’t change my mind

[–] Trouble@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Stop light analogy is completely unequivocal

You’re admitting the technology is in fact flawed if you think it needed to be implemented with supervision. An uno reverse is, every set of traffic lights needs a traffic controller to stop drivers running red lights. Unequivocal, right?

Just stop because you’re wrong, lol

[–] Trouble@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 week ago (2 children)

It’s doing neither

[–] Trouble@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 week ago (9 children)

There's literally nothing wrong with the technology.

Pick a lane troll

[–] Trouble@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 1 week ago (23 children)

The technology is NOT DOING WHAT ITS MEANT TO DO - it is IDENTIFYING DAMAGE WHERE THERE IS NONE - the TECHNOLOGY is NOT working as it should

[–] Trouble@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 1 week ago (26 children)

The technology is literally the problem as it’s not working

view more: next ›