V0ldek

joined 2 years ago
[–] V0ldek@awful.systems 10 points 4 days ago

Sorry darling, but according to my game-theoretical model this discussion ends in my victory in every possible combination of moves, so can we just skip to the point you apologise?

Where... where are you going

[–] V0ldek@awful.systems 10 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I, for one, am excited, because this could be the ultimate bubble. Like think about it, crypto was shit, but at least it was vaguely a thing, like you could buy Bitcoin and order drugs through SilkRoad and you'd have drugs, that's a material use case. LLMs suck ass but ChatGPT exists, you can go to that website and type shit and it will respond, it's garbage but it's garbage you can touch and smell.

Quantum has none of this. It's ultimate vaporware, a technology that literally does not exist, you can't have a PoC, you can't have an early version that you'll lie about being a "big step towards General Quantum Computing" or whatever. This is SV's wet dream, can we make money from basically nothing at all?

[–] V0ldek@awful.systems 10 points 4 days ago

I wrote this post quickly and without thoroughly studying what people have historically written on this topic.

I think that goes without saying on LW but glad someone put it in writing

[–] V0ldek@awful.systems 7 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Banning him just before the funny number too, oof

[–] V0ldek@awful.systems 2 points 1 week ago

So I was thinking about this recently with a colleague and there are two things that I think would be useful:

  • I would actually like a HUD? Like a minimap when walking through the city. Or the ability to popup a small YT video in the corner of my eye. I have no idea if it would actually work with how human vision works, but that's a cool idea for me.
  • Universally good idea: smart glasses that detect advertising billboards and other shit like that and automatically replace them with something. Could be just with white space, or with pleasant landscapes, or giant dicks if you're into that. The possibilities are quite endless. Would be universally beloved by everyone.
[–] V0ldek@awful.systems 2 points 1 week ago

Not, it turns out, for the Meta Raybans, cos they don’t even have screens or projectors!

Wait what? So what are those glasses? I thought they were AR glasses? What do they do then.

[–] V0ldek@awful.systems 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

This is a bundle which originated out of anti-Calvinist polemics written by Catholic and royalist Anglican writers during the early modern period, was picked up by 19th century romantic reactionaries to build the foundation of the emerging Counter-Enlightenment, got carried into the 20th century by various counter-modern literary movements seeking a third way against both capitalism and socialism which could justify the continuing relevance of the traditional humanistic disciplines against the new challenge of the social and psychological sciences, transitioned from being primarily of the political right to the political left because of the ideological aftermaths of WW2 and 1968, and took on its modern form in environmental and anti-globalization activism in the 90s

Parkour! So nazis weren't left-wing but they switched after the war, brilliant.

It is the actual source of the post-60s ideological transformation against the ideas of rationality, science, objectivity, and progress on the left

Pfffffff, lol, what? xD Ye, the left, famously anti-science, unlike the rational thinkers that reside in the White House right now

[–] V0ldek@awful.systems 3 points 1 week ago

Relational

As in a database? What?

[–] V0ldek@awful.systems 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Autodidact, Polymath

Why did you skip the funniest part?

[–] V0ldek@awful.systems 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (6 children)

Can anyone explain to me why tf do promptfondlers hate GPT5 in non-crazy terms? Actually I have a whole list of questions related to this, I feel like I completely lost any connection to this discourse at this point:

  1. Is GPT5 "worse" in any sensible definition of the word? I've long complained that there is no good scientific metric to grade those on but like, it can count 'r's in "strawberry" so I thought it's supposed to be nominally better?
  2. Why doesn't OpenAI simply allow users to use the old model (4o I think?) It sounds like the simplest thing to do.
  3. Do we know if OpenAI actually changed something? Is the model different in any interesting way?
  4. Bonus question: what the fuck is wrong with OpenAI's naming scheme? 4, then 4o? And there's also o4 that's something else??
[–] V0ldek@awful.systems 15 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I hate the fact that now someone might look at me and surmise that I do something related to blockchain or AI, I feel almost like I need a sticker, like those "I bought it before we knew Elon was crazy" they put on Teslas

"I learnt to code before this stupid bubble"

[–] V0ldek@awful.systems 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

The worst are slop-generated recipes that you only realise are fake halfway through reading when they tell you to add half a cup of table salt to your cake batter

view more: ‹ prev next ›