WhyDoYouPersist

joined 2 years ago
[–] WhyDoYouPersist@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

Yo dawg I heard you like microplastics

[–] WhyDoYouPersist@lemmy.world 36 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Hoping this ages like milk, but I'm personally not putting much stock into these theatrics. I feel like the past decade has time and time again shown that schadenfreude only happens in movies, and that every interaction these people have with each other are Neanderthal-level grifts that successfully siphon them more even money from the lower classes.

Color me jaded.

[–] WhyDoYouPersist@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago

This is a weird loredump from Armored Core.

[–] WhyDoYouPersist@lemmy.world 17 points 2 months ago

For the ARC, these federal contracts have been lucrative. According to government spending records, the company has received at least $600,000 from federal contracts so far in 2025, and about $700,000 last year.

I don't know why I was expecting more. US citizens should probably start unmasking who the people making decisions behind these companies are, who would sell out this kind of data on others--all for such an inconsequential amount of money.

[–] WhyDoYouPersist@lemmy.world 74 points 3 months ago (5 children)
[–] WhyDoYouPersist@lemmy.world 16 points 3 months ago

This is incredibly insightful, thanks.

[–] WhyDoYouPersist@lemmy.world 11 points 3 months ago

I don't know how many times I've made this comment but it feels like a lot. The more you use a word the less it means something. How unoriginal do you have to be at writing headlines in 2025 to use a word as meek as "slams."

It's laughable in this context especially. Trying to phrase it like this guy has gotten any kind of consequence for his toddler-from-hell persona.

[–] WhyDoYouPersist@lemmy.world 11 points 4 months ago (3 children)

Every time I see this I think of Carl Sagan. The guy was a wordsmith.

[–] WhyDoYouPersist@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

I think there's truth in it either way. Although I can't think of many things only men like, expanding it to "anything dominated by an overwhelming proportion of men to woman" still works. I think they're more cringe than uncool though.

[–] WhyDoYouPersist@lemmy.world 71 points 5 months ago (2 children)

"Stunning" is such a sad word to use in this context.

[–] WhyDoYouPersist@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago

Generally they tend toward collecting as much money as possible from people so in that regard, people dying isn't good for business. But from an ethical standpoint, no, I wouldn't think so. Do you?

[–] WhyDoYouPersist@lemmy.world 17 points 6 months ago (5 children)

Speculating here but I imagine that would indirectly cause much more death than we already see in wildfire situations, due to people potentially staying home trying to abate damage however they can think of.

view more: next ›