ZDL

Why do you have to "deal with him forever"?

I'd start by questioning my assumptions were I in your shoes.

Yes. 20-21 is a good temperature range for sleep.

Simple conversion system:

• proper temperatures to American moon units: https://duckduckgo.com/?t=ffab&q=25C+in+F
• American moon units to proper temperatures: https://duckduckgo.com/?t=ffab&q=77F+in+C

Either copy the URL and change the temperature (25C or 77F) to your target, or click on the URL and change the input field.

Whatever temperature the outside air is except in the summer when it gets obnoxiously hot and humid, at which point I put a cap of 25°C on the temperature.

So last night it started around 24° at nightfall and fell to 21° in the wee hours.

Dude. Read the room. You're literally in a community called "Fuck AI" and arguing for AI. Are you masochistic or just plain dumb?

Tell me you know nothing about photography without using those words.

The only people I've ever heard say AI is good for "references" are people who aren't artists.

Because AI makes for LOUSY references. (Unless your art style specifically involves clothing pieces melding into each other without rhyme or reasons and cthonic horrors for hands and limbs.)

Tell me you don't understand how generative AI works.

As long as progress continues and humanity survives, computer generated art will eventually outperform humans. It’s pretty obvious, as far as science knows you could just simulate a full human consciousness and pull images out of that somehow, but able to run that in parallel, never deteriorating, never tiring. It’s not a matter of if “AI” can outperform humans, it’s a matter of if humanity will survive to see that and how long it might take.

That did it!

Same thing I do every Sunday. A few chores and, sunlight permitting, maybe some photos for photo essays.

I gave you an example of a possible model.

READ A BOOK BEFORE OPENING YOUR MOUTH AND SPEWING DRIVEL.

I'm not here to give you an Education 101 course. (Frankly, given your performance here thus far, I'm not even certain you could understand the contents of such a course.)

And if "throw everything way but this one thing" isn't "one size fits all" what is it!? You're literally saying "everything being done now is wrong and we should do this ONE THING for everyone. That's practically the definition of "one size fits all"!

I get it. You're a techie and have been trained by techie culture to think (or at least pretend) you're the smartest person in the room. But to first causally dismiss literally decades of research to then propose a "solution" that is risible on the face of it goes well past typical techie arrogance and into Elon Musk territory.

Part of it was. Part of it was me running it past someone I know who studies Old English. :D

I'm sorry you're both colourblind and innumerate. It must be tough going through life with both those conditions!