If there weer to be an 'about us' section to explain what the project is and where it came from, that would let people understand that you are not trying to impersonate the 'creators'.
Perhaps including reto in the network section would be a sign of good faith.
Generally I believe reproducible binaries should be the standard method.
It's interesting that you mention ofrnxmr. I've noticed a lot of community members having a very negative experience with him.
Can someone explain what is going on, or link to something? This all seems sketchy, almost like a hijacking of the project, but I'm guessing not as there is talk of a CCS.
Also, why is the only network listed aloha? why not reto, which tbh thought was the only one.
A very sad day indeed
sounds interesting, thanks
saw your stickers on the day, nice work
Well i guess you could argue that there is the 'Third-Party Apps & Services Update' in the periodical #4. I was thinking along those lines. It's been said before, 'many people are unknowingly taking part in the counter economy', maybe some links to articles or things that may open up their mind to idea that the counter economy is and can be an organized movement.
how about some more counter-economics 'news' mixed in?
out of interest... do localmonero have editorial input?
That looks like speculation, not proof. Guess we'll know closer to the time
monero - traceable digital cash, with some privacy. lol