It looks like Buni, which doesn't contain captions.
antonim
joined 2 years ago
You have to follow my rules and satisfy my framing!
It's not like you offered any other framing, though, except through negation of mine. You are trying to say that the "disagreements" weren't just "disagreements", but you're insistent on not actually describing what they were, what actually happened, what was "my/our behaviour", etc. Just repeated attacks on my description of the situation (mainly based on my disagreement with the claim that Hexbear users were "traumatised" by the federation) and not providing your own.
It's funny how the guy that I initially replied to could clarify his view in a meaningful and hopefully informative way, while you've gone all out with semi-random insults.
what was already pointed out.
Almost nothing has been pointed out. You said my comment resembles those of "incel nazis". No actual explanation or concrete criticism, just aggressive vocabulary and vague accusations. Of course, you can't provide anything more than that - had i actually given even a hint of support for nazi ideology, you'd easily point it out, rather than just calling out... my wording?
bullshit you and every other incel nazi uses every time your behavior is called out
What is this "my/our behaviour" that you're talking about exactly?
Tbh that is an overall miniscule number and I'd say it's not representative (based on my own occasional visits to that shithole through xcancel.com). It's a question what they even counted as hate speech. Openly calling for the death of some minority probably counted, but did all those "just noticing things" barely-concealed dogwhistles count?
Wait, maybe I should read the article before replying to you...
The study measured overt hate speech, the meaning of which was clear to anyone who saw it – speech attacking identity groups or using toxic language. It did not measure covert types of hate speech, such as coded language used by some extremist groups to spread hate but plausibly deny doing so.
If you see anything that's factually incorrect in my comment, please go ahead and point it out.
they had a genuinely traumatic experience
Jesus Christ, this is so ridiculous. They federated on their own accord, and from what I've seen very little non-hexbear users ever came to post on hexbear communitites. Seeing some new users in your online community who disagree with you isn't fucking traumatic, in fact these people adore arguing and "dunking" on "libs".
Today, the court found (among other things), that a few thousand of the summaries that Ross’s AI produced are way too similar to Westlaw’s summaries for it to be a coincidence.
This is probably just inevitable when your dataset is not large enough. I would be interested in seeing the LLM's output compared against the original texts; I do remember the early ChatGPT producing some borderline copies of sentences that you could find online (with one or two words changed).
But people still complain about CGI in film, likely for the same reason it was criticised in the past that you mention - it looks like ass, if done cheaply (today) or with early underdeveloped tech (back in the past). Similarly so, the vast majority of AI-generated images look lazy, generic (duh) and basically give me the "ick".
Yeah, maybe they'll get better in the future. But does that mean that we can't complain about their ugliness (or whatever other issue we have with them) now?
view more: next ›
How did you even do that, assuming you didn't prevent your usage of computers and smartphones altogether? Just sheer willpower?