Yeah, nobody in their right mind could tolerate all this pay to play bullshit.
A great article, thanks for sharing it.
Research produced by Google before a major expansion of Google Translate rolled out three years ago found that translation systems for lower-resourced languages were generally of a lower quality than those for better-resourced ones. Researchers found, for example, that their model would often mistranslate basic nouns across languages, including the names of animals and colors.
I remember discussing this some time ago on reddit. Google Translate very suddenly introduced a number of small languages and IIRC one of the speakers personally expressed frustration at the horrible output. Some people proposed the speakers correct it (you can always report bad translations there and propose your own), but it hardly requires explaining why that's a bad and futile idea...
Nonsense, everything is labelled with its original title there. If you're looking for Russian music there you'll probably have to use the Russian band name, but otherwise not.
Where's the picture from?
Tbh, the mixed ones are probably the worst off.
There's way too many languages and dialects with way too many sounds out there for this to be practically doable. For foreign names some basic degree of approximation is desirable, but nothing more than that. In principle you shouldn't expect or demand people to produce sounds not found in their native dialect (unless they're actually learning the foreign language, but even then they will usually stick to the same language within the same sentence).
Besides, it's not even odd for people not to be able to pronounce stuff according to the standard norm of their own native language, due to the dialectal variety within the same language.
As for names from within the same language, it could sound artificial and even condescending if you tried to go for a pronunciation not native to you. Bob is just Bob, no need to stress that he's "American/British Bob".
~~Charlie Kirk~~ memorial showing a ~~Palantir~~ ad
This is already pretty fucking dystopian by itself, tbh
:3
I mean, their state media is pretty upfront about the intents: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/What_Russia_Should_Do_with_Ukraine
Lemmy is developed by two (2) people and asking for one of them to leave is effectively just killing the project. If you don't like it, you can move to an alternative such as PieFed.
Personally, I can't make myself care about this too much. It's a doshit take (somewhat understandable considering the guy's background), but it was publicised over a year ago, he hasn't said this sort of crap since then*, and Dessalines' whiteknighting for Russia is IMO way more of an issue morally and politically. But at the end of the day the question is whether Lemmy works fine for you or not and whether the admins' opinions harm your experience. I don't think they do, Dessalines bans criticism on his turf but it's just a handful of communities, while the devs are still providing the infrastructure for diametrically opposed views and communities.
*edit 5 days later: apparently he has posted this quasi-apology in the meantime
The problem might be that Google will argue this isn't a downgrade at all, but an upgrade (for "security" reasons). I don't want to be a pessimist, but the tech illiterate judges could eat that up.