I once had something like this happen in another community, and I realized I had blocked one of the active contributors to the community due to me finding them annoying elsewhere. So that's also a possibility, I guess.
cabbage
If other people want something else than a web browser that's fine by me, but then I will at least not be interested any more.
Thankfully Gnome Web is quickly maturing.
I'm not sure what AI would be good for in Firefox, beyond local translation which is already in place. Web browsers and email clients are there to display content made by humans, not generate content for humans to consume.
"We protect your children"
Sometimes they even decorate them!
Fourteen wording pieces of shit.
I can't understand why such provocative symbols are used, everyone understands everything, and anyway it is a symbol of the marginalized
Lemmy does not display microblogs, which is what Threads is.
The only way we'd see content from Threads here is if someone on Threads somehow stumbles over content from here (for example if it's boosted by a Mastodon user they follow), and leaves a comment.
That, or if Threads users tag a community, in the same way Mastodon uses can do.
Basically it expands the theoretical reach of the comment section, but in practice it's unlikely to have a huge effect.
Since we're on a decentralized service, you won't see every post of a user unless you go to their profile on their instance. You're responding to a Mastodon user, so most of her posts will be invisible to you because Lemmy does not support microblogging. It's a bit of a confusing quirk on the Fediverse - you always have to visit people's own instance in order to see their full profile.
A quick look on Mastodon discloses that she's been posting punk and anti-fascist content for years. :)
"HUDUDIDOO DE DAA DE DOO! HODEE DEE HOO!!!"
"Oh, yes, the beautiful song of the sirens"
Did you subscribe to it? Updates from communities are only received if at least one user is a subscribed to them, so you could probably fix this by subscribing. :)
Edit: So yeah, what e0qdk said!
That sounds wonderful! I have some extended family in Romania, but I never visited. Would love to go!
Sure, there are possibilities, I'm just very sceptical of the browser itself being the producer of the content I consume. Sometimes translation is necessary of course, so it's not a rule set in stone.
I agree with you accessibility could be one field where it could be very useful. If this is the priority, I think Mozilla should say they prioritize accessibility, not that they prioritize AI. Machine learning can be a useful tool towards certain ends, but it con never be an end in its own right.