calvinball

joined 2 years ago
[–] calvinball@mtgzone.com 5 points 1 year ago

This was a really well-explained hack, I loved reading this, well done! So fascinating to see that bot logic runs client-side, that the code just creates two 'seats' for players to connect to, and you exploited all that info in a masterful way. Bravo!

[–] calvinball@mtgzone.com 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There will not only be bans for pioneer, but also unbans! I have no clue what they're thinking of unbanning, it'll be an interesting b&r for sure

[–] calvinball@mtgzone.com 3 points 1 year ago

I am HYPED for Amsterdam, this is close enough to my home that I'll be able to go! At the same time it's disappointing that the EU Magiccon will feature the modern pro tour two years in a row, I hope they switch it up for the coming years.

[–] calvinball@mtgzone.com 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I like this one much better than the original colour pie that was posted here, this one's much easier to read and more intuitive <3

[–] calvinball@mtgzone.com 2 points 1 year ago

I find it counter intuitive that the two colour pairings are on the inside and the three colour pairings are on the outside.

[–] calvinball@mtgzone.com 1 points 1 year ago

5-colour is just called 5 colour or WUBRG, and colorless is also just called colorless, they don't have specific names

[–] calvinball@mtgzone.com 12 points 1 year ago

the big negative point is, of course, that this is a sneaky increase in booster cost, a quite significant one at that.

[–] calvinball@mtgzone.com 10 points 1 year ago (4 children)

wow, in practice the changes to Limited might not be very big with this new type of booster, but in the history of MtG this is a humongous change. For the first time since 1993 Draft boosters will have 14 playable cards instead of 15. This changes the fabric of MtG. I feel that in the long run this is a very good shift, all of the problems highlighted in the article are very real, and it seems like they've addressed them well with the Play Booster. Fascinating stuff, I can't wait to hear the Limited podcasts analysing how this changes the game.

[–] calvinball@mtgzone.com 1 points 1 year ago

Well that's why I said it was only good if you have an online collection tracker where you catalog all your cards . I know exactly where all my copies of The Doctor are because I have recorded which versions I have. I can then build my decks online, and once I'm ready to play them I just go to my collection with a list of set and collector numbers and I can pull out exactly what I need

[–] calvinball@mtgzone.com 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Very fair! I would posit that for a large collection where you keep every single card you open, and for which you have an online collection tracker such as deckbox.org, using the organising system I mentioned is still the best. There will always be one single place that a card you're looking for would be, and nowhere else.

[–] calvinball@mtgzone.com 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)

as your collection grows, so must your storage solutions change. Here are the phases my collection went through:

phase 1: everything stored randomly in prerelease and bundle boxes

phase 2: buying a few empty bundle boxes online so I have 5 bundle boxes, storing per colour and in ascending mana value

phase 3: getting a longbox (google 'tcg longbox') that holds 1000 cards and storing my cards in there. At this point I switched to ordering in the objectively best way for big collections: per set, from oldest set to newest set, in ascending collection number (the number on the bottom left of the card). Ordering per collection number will also automatically order your cards per colour and alphabetically for every set.

phase 4: getting multiple longboxes to accommodate the ever expanding collection, continuing with the collection method of phase 3

trades are still in a binder though!

view more: next ›