custard_swollower

joined 2 years ago

Counter-counter point: people don’t get a Mac or windows laptop to learn about osx or windows. They generally want to run software or at least browser to do what they need to do.

[–] custard_swollower@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Uh, memory metrics in Linux are a pain. The only tool that reports most cached as available is htop. free, top and a lot of other software (like node_exporter) will report that a lot of cached memory is not available.

To OP: don’t worry, a lot of Linux tools are smart enough to give back memory if memory pressure rises.

[–] custard_swollower@lemmy.world 22 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Microsoft is big tech, and GitHub is owned by y Microsoft.

…and then you learn that packageX v1 is not maintained anymore and relies through a deep set of dependencies on a seriously vulnerable package (in a version which is also not maintained anymore).

Sorry, I had a pretty eventful December :)

[–] custard_swollower@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

My take is that it’s already your systems feature, rather than admins responsibility. If you treat departments like customers, you’d find a good way to spread the costs. If something is just a „common infrastructure”, you will always find something that makes costs that doesn’t have an easy way to track who triggered that - because you don’t pass enough information with it.

[–] custard_swollower@lemmy.world 23 points 2 months ago (4 children)

Not sure what is hard in it - you need consistent tagging, and that by itself gives you a lot of mileage in cost explorer.

[–] custard_swollower@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Yes, I don’t believe any of them to be true. Most cultures got incompatible explanations to them, without a way to tell which is actually correct - my take is that each explanation is made up. And because people believe those explanations, they are not interested in digging into natural explanations.

Examples: seizures, schizophrenia, natural disasters, weather, infectious diseases

[–] custard_swollower@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago (3 children)

You may have misunderstood me - supernatural theories are worthless because they are non-falsifiable.

[–] custard_swollower@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago

Ok. I don’t believe they do experience supernatural. I think people are gullible, only selectively critical, and are often influenced by their culture to believe in supernatural explanations. And some people are just frauds. I believe honest people get tricked by their culture to regard unknown as supernatural, and by accepting that explanation, never find the natural behind the unknown.

[–] custard_swollower@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago (5 children)

Not really, because every non-falsifiable theory is true at the same time. I mean, I can’t forbid anyone from considering.

[–] custard_swollower@lemmy.world 16 points 2 months ago (7 children)

Any non-falsifiable theory is only worth so much.

view more: next ›