dgerard

joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] dgerard@awful.systems 7 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Augmented reality for the Google Glass. Not, it turns out, for the Meta Raybans, cos they don't even have screens or projectors!

[–] dgerard@awful.systems 17 points 1 day ago (1 children)

just found out these glasses are not even Augmented Reality. They have neither screens nor projectors. Just cameras, a mic, and bone conduction earphones. The interface is voice control. They are literally only for taking creepshots. So Zuckerberg is staying on-brand.

[–] dgerard@awful.systems 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

the interesting thing is i looked and that isn't actually a big enough market to sustain itself

[–] dgerard@awful.systems 9 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Nikolai Durov has two Ph.Ds in maths, and is convinced he is the smartest man in the world, and Telegram's cryptography follows directly

[–] dgerard@awful.systems 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] dgerard@awful.systems 8 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (2 children)

a lot of companies are chasing the humanoid form because they’ll be able to immediately adapt to existing infrastructure (to replace human workers).

that's the story, but this doesn't work, like, at all, with just a moment's thought.

if humanoid was a good shape we'd have humanoid robots already.

the reason is they're selling sci fi dreams of robot servants even though these dreams are lies.

[–] dgerard@awful.systems 5 points 1 week ago

That's Yudkowsky and Piper's "glowfic"

[–] dgerard@awful.systems 20 points 1 week ago

they're a Thiel op

[–] dgerard@awful.systems 3 points 1 week ago

UPDATE: Seraphinne Vallora have admitted the Vogue ad image was a photo from an ordinary modeling shoot with a bit of AI afterwards. They phrased it as bragging about their hard work, of course. https://www.instagram.com/p/DMm4KkfoYCj/

[–] dgerard@awful.systems 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

because i know what you like

[–] dgerard@awful.systems 11 points 1 week ago

Trump apologetics doesn't really make the bar here. Hopefully you will find a sub that is more accepting of whatever your condition is.

[–] dgerard@awful.systems 41 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Microsoft Edge

 

Need to let loose a primal scream without collecting footnotes first? Have a sneer percolating in your system but not enough time/energy to make a whole post about it? Go forth and be mid: Welcome to the Stubsack, your first port of call for learning fresh Awful you’ll near-instantly regret.

Any awful.systems sub may be subsneered in this subthread, techtakes or no.

If your sneer seems higher quality than you thought, feel free to cut’n’paste it into its own post — there’s no quota for posting and the bar really isn’t that high.

The post Xitter web has spawned soo many “esoteric” right wing freaks, but there’s no appropriate sneer-space for them. I’m talking redscare-ish, reality challenged “culture critics” who write about everything but understand nothing. I’m talking about reply-guys who make the same 6 tweets about the same 3 subjects. They’re inescapable at this point, yet I don’t see them mocked (as much as they should be)

Like, there was one dude a while back who insisted that women couldn’t be surgeons because they didn’t believe in the moon or in stars? I think each and every one of these guys is uniquely fucked up and if I can’t escape them, I would love to sneer at them.

Previous week

view more: next ›