foxtrots

joined 2 years ago
[–] foxtrots@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago

Is there a typo here? If you make 140k a year in the US it puts you in the top 10% of earners, but still below average. Yes, part of the richest in the sense that most of the world probably makes less than you, but nowhere near the richest in terms of what these statistics are talking about when they refer to the top 1% - ie. people who make close to, if not more than, a million dollars per hour.

That is to say - someone making 140k is not capable of the levels of pollution that people with private jets, who take dozens of flights every year - not even scratching the surface of their shopping and eating habits, and the pollution caused by their businesses and investments.

[–] foxtrots@beehaw.org 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Good to get confirmation - I cut around it and will see how it goes. If it is a goner, at least now I know what to do better next time 😔

 

This is my first attempt at regrowing (baby) bok choy from kitchen scraps. The growth is great but the outside is super wet and mushy. Is there any fixing this, or is this stalk a total goner?

[–] foxtrots@beehaw.org 3 points 1 year ago

Thrifting is always best IMO. The selection depends on your location; I've noticed smaller, more rural areas tend to have better selections than suburban areas or cities. There's also online thrifting through sites like thredup and vinted - obviously, your mileage may vary. I use FB marketplace to get home goods but I'm sure it's good for getting local used clothes, too.

[–] foxtrots@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago

The area where I'm struggling is the fact that, to my knowledge, Lomi doesn't actually make the organic matter "decompose" - which means, presumably, it would still decompose when disposed of, right?

I got mine when I moved (used as well - only 150 bucks!) because it became way less feasible to drop off my organic waste in my new city. It definitely drastically reduced the amount of trash I had to take out (as compared to just... throwing everything out), and reduced smelliness in the trash. If it does actually reduce methane emissions, then I would say it's a great option. If it doesn't... then, well, it probably cuts down on trash loads and things like that, but I'm not sure that it would otherwise be worth it.

I've seen some people unhappy with the end product in terms of using it in place of regular compost; I know their "lomi pods" are pretty much required if you want to use it for plants - so you'll need to buy those (as well as filter replacements - although I'm pretty sure you can just use regular activated carbon pellets) - and it's possible some people weren't using those. Just something to keep in mind!

 

Not sure if this is the right space for this question, but gonna try anyway - please forgive me if it isn't!

So, first thing’s first - I know Lomi isn’t actually good for composting. I bought mine secondhand for a fraction of the price because there’s no food scrap drop off near me, and I am not interested in doing a proper home compost. I don’t have any plants; I’m only interested in reducing my food waste.

One question that I keep coming back to, and that I’ve had a lot of trouble getting the answer to, is does Lomi actually reduce methane emissions? The website says yes: “With Lomi, food waste undergoes aerobic break down (in the presence of oxygen), meaning methane isn’t produced. Then, when Lomi fertilizer is used in plants, carbon is sequestered in soil and plant matter.” However… I’m not using it for fertilizing plants. I just use it to process food waste so I’m not just throwing it directly into the trash.

Does it compact the trash? 100%. We usually throw out the output after maybe 6 cycles; that’s the equivalent of 5 freezer bags full of food scraps (mostly banana peels tbh). One thing I am 100% sure of is the fact that it reduces the frequency of my household taking out the trash, since it’s not full of smelly food or attracting pests, and it weighs a ton less. But… is it actually reducing methane emissions? If my trash bag ends up in the landfill, will that aerobically-processed compacted food still release the same exact amount of methane emissions now that it’s trapped in a bag with tons of trash above it?

Any help on this is appreciated. Thanks!

 

Hi all! So, first thing's first - I know Lomi isn't actually good for composting. I bought mine secondhand for a fraction of the price because there's no food scrap drop off near me, and I am not interested in doing a proper home compost. I don't have any plants; I'm only interested in reducing my food waste.

One question that I keep coming back to, and that I've had a lot of trouble getting the answer to, is does Lomi actually reduce methane emissions? The website says yes: "With Lomi, food waste undergoes aerobic break down (in the presence of oxygen), meaning methane isn't produced. Then, when Lomi fertilizer is used in plants, carbon is sequestered in soil and plant matter." However... I'm not using it for fertilizing plants. I just use it to process food waste so I'm not just throwing it directly into the trash.

Does it compact the trash? 100%. We usually throw out the output after maybe 6 cycles; that's the equivalent of 5 freezer bags full of food scraps (mostly banana peels tbh). One thing I am 100% sure of is the fact that it reduces the frequency of my household taking out the trash, since it's not full of smelly food or attracting pests, and it weighs a ton less. But... is it actually reducing methane emissions? If my trash bag ends up in the landfill, will that aerobically-processed compacted food still release the same exact amount of methane emissions now that it's trapped in a bag with tons of trash above it?

Any help on this is appreciated. Thanks!

[–] foxtrots@beehaw.org 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I think it's a super complicated topic. My understanding of the quote is that ableism is much bigger and more complicated than language, but we should be aware of how our language reflects ableist views - like the normalization of ableist slurs into our everyday vernacular, for example. In other words, our society is so comfortable with ableism, that even disabled people and advocates for disability rights may use ableist terminology regularly, whether or not they're aware of the origins.

I, personally, don't believe that "lame" is necessarily a word that needs to be changed, but I do believe it's a word with ableist origins. Like our conversation on "dumb", IMO most people don't think about the technical definition of "lame" anymore - but I might be wrong, or it might be regional. It's ultimately a personal choice whether or not it feels hurtful - and obviously, if someone tells you to not use a term around them, that's important to respect.

The key takeaway, to me, is that we should be mindful of how much ableism is normalized in our lives. I think you're definitely doing that, based on this post. It doesn't mean that using terms on this list is only ableist if you're thinking negatively about disabled people when you use it; it means that we should be thoughtful with our language, but more importantly, thoughtful of how our words and actions may be reinforcing hurtful systems. To use the example from before - if someone doesn't use the word "crazy" except when describing mentally ill people, that can speak to how they see mentally ill people as not just people who are ill, but as people who are undesirable boogeymen.

Take it on a case-by-case basis, IMO, and follow your gut if you feel shitty about certain words - better safe than sorry. But, at the end of the day, it's just... complicated!

[–] foxtrots@beehaw.org 9 points 2 years ago

NO STRAWS NO STRAWS NO STRAWS NO STRAWS

The dentist will probably tell you everything you need to know, but after having spoken to someone who had 3 dry sockets due to using straws after removing her wisdom teeth, it feels like the most important point to drill in.

My partner had a lot of soylent, fruit/veg juice, soup, apple sauce after the procedure. Get some ice cream or a shake (WITH A SPOON) afterwards if you're not nauseous - you deserve a treat. Apparently the weird ice from Sonic is really good when you get a tooth out, I've never had it lol. Good luck on your procedure, and don't delay it!! Just get it over with so you never have to think about it again. You're gonna be fine 💖

[–] foxtrots@beehaw.org 8 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I'm not mute, but to me, using "dumb" to describe someone who is mute sounds... worse? It feels like the equivalent of recognizing that "crazy" has baggage and not using it in everyday speech, but continuing to use it to describe mentally ill people. I understand that it's not a perfect comparison, but it feels like sometimes, words become too enmeshed in their modern-day insulting uses to feel okay using them to describe a community, even if it is the technical definition of the word.

If anyone who is mute/nonverbal/nonspeaking sees this and I'm wrong - please let me know!! I don't mean to overstep, I just want to share my perspective.

[–] foxtrots@beehaw.org 4 points 2 years ago

The YA series Uglies will always be one of my favorites. I remember reading it as a tween and not knowing quite how to describe it; a friend called it a dystopian novel, which is true, but... it didn't feel quite "right", or at least, like the complete truth. The setting is utopian, bordering on solarpunk; no more worrying about climate change or overconsumption - we've fixed the climate, everything we own is infinitely recyclable in minutes, nature is healing! - the only thing we need to worry about is looking good at the party. But, it turns out, living in a society where the most important thing in the world is being beautiful - even if everyone is beautiful - is maybe... not great? Almost by design?

It was written to be a critique of plastic surgery, but I think there's so much to dig into even as an adult in 2023. It probably lit a nice rebellious fire in teenage me, questioning authority and the seemingly unquestionable rules of the world. The relationships between the characters are still fascinating to me, and I'm still mesmerized by the beautiful, terrible world they live in. Even though the writing style is very simple to be easily digestible to early readers, the ideas the book explores are as complicated as you let them be. Surveillance, nature vs. nurture, institutionalized self-hatred, autonomy, sustainability, forced metamorphosis... there's a lot to unpack.

[–] foxtrots@beehaw.org 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

That's fair. Are you in a place where everybody knows each other? If your parents aren't really likely to hear it from anywhere else, you can also come out to other people, like at school or in your social circles, without necessarily having to come out to your family.

[–] foxtrots@beehaw.org 19 points 2 years ago

Get some rest! Hopefully when you come back the mental load is lighter and things work out, but at the end of the day, none of this is more important than your health and well-being.

[–] foxtrots@beehaw.org 11 points 2 years ago

I get what you mean, but I disagree. As a teen, I thought I had an obligation to come out to everyone, and make a whole big announcement. It was a huge relief to hear that actually, I don't owe anyone information that would be exhausting to share and could make my life harder. It was my choice, and no one else's, and there was no timeline I had to follow.

[–] foxtrots@beehaw.org 7 points 2 years ago

Exactly this! I pick and choose who knows based on how comfy I am around someone. Like you, I'm bi in a "straight-passing" relationship, so many people aren't aware; my dad will probably never know unless I date a girl, or he finds out in some random way, but I just don't really care to share that part of my life with him. The older I get, the less effort I make to keep anything a secret. But I don't make a strong conscious effort to come out to people if I don't feel like it.

 

Posting this here because I figure it's relevant to cooking and the decisions we make about our food and our health. I was kind of hoping for a gas stove in my new apartment (I'd only ever had gas stoves) despite being a huge environmentalist because I'd always been told you can't get "those good sears" on electric - now that I have an electric stove, I'm here to say that's bullshit, with the right pots and pans, it can do anything a gas stove can, without the risks.

Reading about this study really opened my eyes to how lucky I am to not be stuck with another gas stove. If anyone here has the means to switch to electric but has been on the fence about it, I hope this can help with that decision.

Some highlights from the article:

"A new Stanford-led analysis finds that a single gas cooktop burner on high or a gas oven set to 350 degrees Fahrenheit can raise indoor levels of the carcinogen benzene above those in secondhand tobacco smoke. Benzene also drifts throughout a home and lingers for hours in home air, according to the paper published June 15 in Environmental Science & Technology."

"Previous studies focused on leaks from stoves when they are off, and did not directly measure resulting benzene concentrations. The researchers found gas and propane burners and ovens emitted 10 to 50 times more benzene than electric stoves. Induction cooktops emitted no detectable benzene whatsoever."

"A previous Stanford-led study showed that gas-burning stoves inside U.S. homes leak methane with a climate impact comparable to the carbon dioxide emissions from about 500,000 gasoline-powered cars. They also expose users to pollutants, such as nitrogen dioxide, which can trigger respiratory diseases. A 2013 meta-analysis concluded that children who live in homes with gas stoves had a 42% greater risk of asthma than children living in homes without gas stoves, and a 2022 analysis calculated that 12.7% of childhood asthma in the U.S. is attributable to gas stoves."

view more: next ›