Self-identifying as "progressive" and being anti-copyright and thus pro-AI is something I've seen before online.
I've never charged money for my creative output, but my "moral right" as an author/creator is very important to me.
Self-identifying as "progressive" and being anti-copyright and thus pro-AI is something I've seen before online.
I've never charged money for my creative output, but my "moral right" as an author/creator is very important to me.
Everything about this is terrible:
Crypto scammer reported to ICE after stealing cancer patient’s treatment fund
TechDirt has posts about this quite often.
some more speculation here
https://protos.com/paxos-300-trillion-fat-finger-raises-concerns-over-pyusd-integrity/
Pretty sure post author knew all about this scam, and just pretended to fall for it to reveal how GenAI had "saved him".
2 items
Here's a lobster being sad a poor uwu smol bean AI shill is getting attacked
Would you take a kinder tone to the author's lack of skill/knowledge if it weren't about AI? It would be ironic if hatred of AI caused us to lose our humanity.
here's political mommy blog Wonkette having fun explaining the hallucinatory insanity that is Google AI summaries
Except the people selling expensive PCs.
Good news everyone, there's 2 bonkers pieces about the stars and the galaxy on LW right now!
Here's a dude very worried about how comets impacting the sun could cause it to flare and scorch the earth. Nothing but circumstantial evidence, and GenAI researched to boot. Appeared in the EA forum as part of their "half-baked ideas" amnesty
The only thing I'd note about this is that even if the comet strikes along the plane of eliptic (not an unreasonable assumption), the planet would still have to be exactly in the right place for this assumed plume of energy to do any damage. And if it hits the Sahara or the Pacific, NBD presumably.
(Edit turns out the above is just the abstract, the full piece is here:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1OHgc7Q4git6OfDNTE_TDf9fFNgrEEnCUfnPMIwbK3vg/edit?usp=sharing)
Then there's this person looking really far ahead into how to get energy from the universe
https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/YC4L5jxHnKmCDSF9W/some-astral-energy-extraction-methods
Tying galaxies together: Anchor big rope to galaxies as they get pulled apart by dark matter. Build up elastic potential energy which can be harvested. Issue: inefficient. [...] Not clear (to me) how you anchor rope to the galaxies.
Neutrino capture: Lots of neutrinos running around, especially if you use hawking radiation to capture mass energy of black holes. So you might want to make use of them. But neutrinos are very weakly interacting, so you need dense matter to absorb their energy/convert them to something else. Incredibly dense. To stop one neutrino with lead you need 1 lightyear of matter, with a white dwarf you need an astronomical unit, and for a neutron star (10^17 kg/m^3 density, 10km radium) you need 340 meters of matter. So neutrino capture is feasible,
(my emphasis)
Black Hole Bombs: Another interesting way of extracting energy from black holes are superradiant instabilities, i.e. making the black hole into a bomb. You use light to extract angular momentum from the blackhole, kinda like the Penrose process, and get energy out. With a bunch of mirrors, you can keep reflecting the light back in and repeat the process. This can produce huge amounts of energy quickly, on the order of gamma ray bursts for stellar mass black holes. Or if you want it to be quicker, you can get 1% of the blackholes mass energy out in 13 seconds. How to collect this is unclear.
(again, my emphasis)
Same author has a recent post titled "Don't Mock Yourself". Glad to see they've taken this advice to heart and outsourced the mocking.
"Why is LessWrong awesome and it's because we're prepared to take racism seriously isn't it"
https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/HZrqTkTCgnFhEgxvQ/what-is-lesswrong-good-for
The focussing on Covid is weird seeing that AFAIK basically everyone who knew anything about pandemics were sounding the alarm at the same time that (some) rats and techbros were trying to corner the market in protective gear.
Shoulda used Grok
“I’d already been ChatGPT-ed into bed at least once. I didn’t want it to happen again.”
According to a 2024 YouGov poll, for instance, around half of Americans aged 18-34 reported having been, like Holly, in a situationship (a term it defines as “a romantic connection that exists in a gray area, neither strictly platonic nor officially a committed relationship”).
“Over the course of a week, I realised I was relying on it quite a lot,” she says. “And I was like, you know what, that’s fine – why not outsource my love life to ChatGPT?”
She describes being on the receiving end of the kinds of techniques that Jamil uses – being drilled with questions, “like you’re answering an HR questionnaire”, then off the back of those answers “having conversations where it feels as if the other person has a tap on my phone because everything they say is so perfectly suited to me”.
Did not know Farage was gay