karakoram

joined 1 year ago
[–] karakoram@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Spoken like someone who has never had a surprise maintenance issue pop up unexpectedly that costs multiple times your monthly mortgage.

[–] karakoram@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

To get a townhome in the bay at ~2k a month is a complete outlier with respect to rent. I live in a similar COL area and the cheapest you could rent that kind of space is for ~3.5k monthly in the present market.

[–] karakoram@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

The car argument is not good. Anyone can buy and operate a car immediately on private property without any interference from government in the US.

[–] karakoram@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Did you actually read your "source"? The article claims a lot but offers no substantiation to many of the claims.

[–] karakoram@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Stratasys' J850 totally has this capability. Full color printing with variable durometer elastomers.

[–] karakoram@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Aviation regulations are written in blood. There's a reason general aviation is stuck with technology developed in the 50s and 60s: innovating is so expensive from a compliance standpoint and production volume so low that new technologies enter that space at a glacial pace. A new Jet-A burning piston engine is only available in airframes that cost $1M+ and the cost of retrofitting in older airframes is prohibitive. If we weren't so restrictive on the regulations, capitalism would offer a solution at a vastly reduced price point. So, would you rather have less provably safe aircraft, leaded avgas, or the complete prohibition of aircraft that make up the vast majority of the GA population?

[–] karakoram@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

We aren't mind readers. If you think we are wrong, explain why. You can call an attempt at defining your poor communication a strawman, but it only shields your ideas from the test of debate.

[–] karakoram@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (3 children)

That's no strawman. You just refuse to see that there is no universal way to decide upon value that fits everyone's notion of it. If both people in an exchange come away satisfied, did one exploit the other? How do you strictly define the excess value on each side of the transaction? Your idea of a profit-less society doesn't consider how we'd pragmatically exchange our labor to achieve that.

[–] karakoram@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Bans are subsets of regulation, no?

[–] karakoram@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Well, it's mass shootings not mass killings. However, that's not really important in this discussion when you can point to the Hamburg mass shooting in March and this other one from July with 3 fatalities.

[–] karakoram@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

There have been at least 2 mass shootings in Germany since March a simple Google search reveals. 🤔

view more: next ›