Four for leave. Five for remain.
It's getting towards that cursed ratio again. π
Four for leave. Five for remain.
It's getting towards that cursed ratio again. π
I think you should appy for the job and then do a reverse Eliza Doolittle after the kid gets into Eton.
Oi gotcha mi'lud! Oim really a propa workin' class scallywag I am! Fooled ya good n' propa, innit?! Have a banana π.
Or whatever you northerners sound like....
I have a couple friends like this. Live with their moms, over 25, never had a job or anything. Only plays games. I feel so bad for them because they don't think they are smart but they definitely are, they just dont spend their time wisely.
If you hadn't stated they were over 25 I would have assumed they were children. Because they sound like children. Someone has enabled this behaviour so that they can live like a child. So maybe taking these enabling factors away is what you can do to help. I don't pretend that's easy.
What are Labour scared of? I can understand the Tories dragging their heels. But why is Labour in a tiz about this?
Pass that act of Parliament get him removed. It's not a fucking birth right, it's a privilege to serve as a royal. And if he doesn't want to then he can fuck off to the US like his nephew.
I grew up on MJ.
If you were a kid in the 90s MJ grew up on you too.... π .
How will they appeal to bigots and racists to win votes? They'll actually have to visit their homes.
If the shoe fits...
If the shoe fits? Seriously? Fucking hell, mate. Would you say the same about minorities or people of colour? If the shoe fits and some of them are doing evil things then let's stop complaining about branding them all bad they all just me the same, right? Those are your principles? Please tell me that's not the case.
Why can't you simply say that some men are bad some men are good but I judge everyone on their actions and not naively on what they are?
Can you point to where I have said women don't deserve bodily autonomy? Please do this. You've brought this up a number of times to deflect from the point about stigmatising all men based on your low opinion of them. So show me where I've say this or disagree with it.
I was responding to your comments. Not about the post. Again. Sweeping generalisations. Stop. It.
I feel sorry that you only have bad examples in your life that you feel the need to taint all men so harshly by your low standards of them. But that isn't helpful to anyone and it actively pushes people away from you.
would be to complain about an obvious joke mirroring the language of the comment I replied to
Oi vey, the irony is strong in this one π.
I can't tell if you're trolling or not π π€£ because I'm not taking about bodily autonomy or feelings being hurt. I don't know how you managed to parse that from my comment π.
Men in this country need to wake up and start caring about women's rights without needing to have a daughter to realise women are people too...
Stop. Making. Sweeping. Generalisations ππ. Your comment implies that unless men are fathers with daughters they don't care about women's rights. That's a stupid generalisation not backed by any evidence.
Internet posters in this country need to wake up and not make sweeping generalisations that sours the discourse around sensitive topics.
5 second time penalty awarded to the hackers after stewards enquiry.