menas

joined 1 year ago
[–] menas@lemmy.wtf 17 points 2 months ago

Time for real hardware

[–] menas@lemmy.wtf 5 points 2 months ago (3 children)

I would have put OpenBSD in "focus on security". Or hell The only prebuild thing their is pain, pain and suffering

[–] menas@lemmy.wtf 10 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Brave is not a privacy focus browser.

[–] menas@lemmy.wtf 1 points 3 months ago

In France, the left government of the "Front Populaire" was forced by the unions to pass social laws that was not on their program, including 40h works per week, the 8h/day and the first paid holidays. The struggle of this unionize include general strike, demonstration and riot, and was sometimes repressed by the State.

The 40h weeks where already done in Italy (until the rise of the fascism), thanks to the red week. Following the death of 3 people during a demonstration against war and colonization, an expropriator general strike was made in nothern Italy by local unions. Those strike do not stop every production, but focus on the needs of the workers. For example, foods was still collectid and dispatch, including by trains, but without trade; Malatesta try to warm workers to not accept the bourgeoisie gift, but to achieve the socialization of the society. Central unions accept, and betray the revolution. That may explain why the Operaism came from Italy. And why we -anarcho syndicalist- do not trust unions with hierarchy

There is some other exemple, of cours in Spain with the CNT (20 millions people living in aracho syndicalist situation), in Ukraine with the joining force of mutualized farmers and industrial unions, and the IWW

[–] menas@lemmy.wtf 11 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Unionize fellllloooooooows

[–] menas@lemmy.wtf 37 points 3 months ago (3 children)

That does not magically appears in Europe, but the victories thanks to strong unionism and revolutionary unionism. The same that was directly attacked by the US government in the 1920's

[–] menas@lemmy.wtf 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

There is no or a very small impact of regulation on the number of exiled people coming in country. However, making more people illegal let bosses exploit them more. Those workers could not sue their boss because of those regulations, and most conservative unions rely unfortunately too much on legal solutions.

So if a country couldn't limit immigrations, it could exploit more people and bybass human right with regulations against exiled people.

Yes, this is only positive for far-right bosses, and awful for others. But guess who decide in a capitalist economy ?

[–] menas@lemmy.wtf 6 points 5 months ago

What ? A corporation that earn money in selling personal data, that don't want to share its code that run on a device with a microphone, actually use it ? I'm shocked

[–] menas@lemmy.wtf 3 points 5 months ago

So what is a confederation of different industries ? Why many of those confederation accept every industries but not cops association ? Finally, people organized tend to have share some analyses and goals, and some of them appends to be left-wing. It's not u surprise than people struggling for their rights meat the same issues, and share some common interests. Being smash by cops for no reasons when you just want to keep your job is an example why organized workers consider that cops have not the same interests

[–] menas@lemmy.wtf 7 points 5 months ago

We used C++ based software. Who need sanity ? Clearly overrated

[–] menas@lemmy.wtf 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

"Have your heard about our nor God nor Saviors, Anarcho-unionism" ?

[–] menas@lemmy.wtf 19 points 6 months ago

There is many homeless women; unfortunately because of threat of rape and harassment (somehow underlined here), lots of them have to not look homeless. They have to buy fine clothes, and makeup. If you think that people "just have to prostitute lol", you have to ask why you don't. There is a fucking lot of violence against sex workers. Usually people that could prostitute have coworkers to rely on, or are forced to work for a boss (or a pimp, that the same thing). If the first case is the most common in most of countries, it's not available for people with few social connections; which is usually the main reason of homelessness

view more: ‹ prev next ›