no_im_doesnt

Interestingly, on TV CBC said the opposite: prices from the farms would go up universally to help offset the change in the massive US market.

But I hope you're right.

It's interesting that this article doesn't quite match what was said in CBC's TV news. There they blamed the size of the US market, saying that bean producers would have to raise prices for everyone to offset US costs.

Yep. We're seeing it with coffee bean producers already. The US is such an enormous market that everyone's prices will go up to account for lost revenue.

The details in this Guardian article are not clear at all.

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/north/canadian-detained-us-border-1.7483021

This CBC article seems to confirm what you're saying (according to statements from the woman's mother). I totally agree with you about the red flags and poor decisions of this woman. And it seems like we're in agreement on disliking what happened after.

Thanks for chatting it out!

You've linked some sage advice. I've found immigration to be a crapshoot - mostly depending on how the immigration officer was feeling that day.

Rereading the article (admittedly from her side of things), the revocation of her visa seems unfair. But ultimately that's for the immigration officer to decide.

However, if she was using a land entry, it means she had to "flagpole" - leave the US for Mexico and return. Canadians don't need to apply for a visa to visit Mexico (nor the US, only to work). So why wasn't she given the option to head to the Tijuana airport on her own dime?

It just feels like someone wanted to be unnecessarily cruel. According to this woman's story, the officer mentioned her work with hemp products. Maybe the guy had some personal anger problems.

edit: I'm upvoting you, btw. Here to learn and share. Not sure who's downvoting you.

Yes I definitely agree here. I appreciate you taking the time. I don't disagree with her denial, it's the detention that drives me nuts.

In hindsight it was foolish, but not illegal. She should have received a "no" and maybe "we say no because of a previous entry denial." And then she would have turned around and flown back to BC (a few hundred dollars poorer, but not in chains).

If by "today's political climate," you mean the sudden and illegal actions the president of the USA has ordered and USA's ICE has carried out, then I don't disagree with you. I wouldn't have done what she did. But I also don't blame her for being detained. We have to admit that this is lunacy! And I'm glad that she has been vocal, so people can understand that this isn't just a crackdown on illegal crossings.

I'm not sure if you've ever tried immigrating between the US and Canada, but it is absolutely valid to apply for visas and work permits at a port of entry. It does not matter which country you arrive from - there is no requirement that you must enter from your home country.

It also does not matter if you've been previously denied. Denial is not a conviction, and the US is happy to take your money for you to apply again. Especially if you have a new job that may change the circumstances.

None of what she did was shady - at all. It's super common. And legal. And the worst thing that should have happened is a denial of entry.

It's a fair question, if you haven't gone through it. I agree: it seems ridiculous!

I grew up surrounded by authority figures who didn't have a nuanced understanding of mental health. I internalized being called "lazy" and "a procrastinator," because everyone told me that I was choosing to be bad at managing my time and focus!

I believed this right into the upper management of a tech company in my 30s. And I'd get down on myself constantly for zoning out during meetings and being overwhelmed at long-term complex tasks. "Wow I'm so lazy and unmotivated," I'd think to myself in between client meetings. For years.

A friend showed me the ADHD symptoms (probably after I zoned out for the thousandth time), and it was a shock and how closely they described my childhood, schooling, and professional and social life.

Some people do just fine with their coping mechanisms - I discovered that I had quite a few! But I made the choice to seek medication. Taking it was like breathing air for the first time.

So that's what I was doing.

Oh yes, I remember this. Duke assessed the river bed and determined that a cleanup could cause more damage and would be super expensive. So they did no cleanup AND increased rates.

I completely agree, and I've seen some wild entitlement from FOSS users. People who haven't spent one red cent have no problem making rude demands and calling developers "lazy."

I watched some of Immich's users throw a tantrum when Immich added a purchase button (that supports the project but changes nothing else). A lot of the complaints boiled down to "hide the purchase button so I don't feel guilt."

It's a miracle anyone works on open source projects.