what? and ban all flights to australia?
ohwhatfollyisman
this team is truly the invertibles.
if only we had an abundance big tall leafy structures that have naturally evolved to capture carbon.
1.4142135623746...?
i don't know enough about cocaine and want to learn.
setting aside the axe he has to grind and in the specific context of his comments about fentanyl and whisky, how accurate or inaccurate are his statements? what makes them so?
no, concrete wall.
inquiry: i'm just catching up with the boxing day matches highlights, and there's a heavy smoky cloud visible in multiple grounds.
what is it? just condensate? a fog? mist? or were those matches played in new delhi?
wow, premium in the usa is expensive. it's a little under $3 per month here in india for the family plan and even that's after a recent 16% hike. the individual plan is even cheaper.
i guess these rates are in store for us as well in the future?
why, though? the choice of the year ending on the 31st of december is wholly made by man--nothing in nature dictates that choice.
if anything, the original calendar had february mopping up after all the other months (which is why the fewer days as well as the tacking on of the leap day there). we've already advanced the end of the year by an arbitrary amount of two months. what's one more week?
unless, of course, you're saying that the year in review does not take into account the last week of 2023. in which case, yes, you're right.
i hear what you're saying but that doesn't seem to be the (ahem) case.
if that were so, one would have chosen "she/ her" or "they/ them" -- pairing each nominative with its accusative partner and still fitting well within this perceived word limit. one wouldn't use two separate nominative case words in its place.
there has to be something deeper in this choice. not that it should be treated as sinister or anything; this choice should be just as deeply respected. i'm just curious as to the reasons behind it.
huh. so global warming does have some benefits.