robolemmy

joined 2 years ago
[–] robolemmy@lemmy.world 12 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Terribly misleading headline. The actual finding is that people who believe in karma are less likely to punish a brand directly by boycotting because they think karma will do it.

[–] robolemmy@lemmy.world 19 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I won’t buy 7 until the drm rootkit is gone.

[–] robolemmy@lemmy.world 31 points 6 days ago (4 children)

I’m that weird guy who prefers the cooked taste of UHT pasteurized milk.

[–] robolemmy@lemmy.world 19 points 1 week ago
[–] robolemmy@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

I don’t care at all what happens on reddit. Why do so many people think “lemmy” is Latin for “place to bitch and whine about reddit?”

[–] robolemmy@lemmy.world 31 points 1 week ago

GULF OF MEXICO

[–] robolemmy@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

Not that I've been able to find. I rarely notice but when I do it's quite frustrating.

[–] robolemmy@lemmy.world 25 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

I'm using a Shield TV Pro with the default launcher disabled, replaced with FLauncher, and the netflix and voice search buttons disabled via button mapper.

I'm 1000% happy with it and absolutely would not go back to an actual HTPC.

Oh, I also uninstalled youtube and replaced it with SmartTube Beta

[–] robolemmy@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

Thank you! I'll give that a go!

[–] robolemmy@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

My firewall is closed, nothing is forwarded. This is all on my LAN only. I just don't want the non-https ports available at all, even on the LAN.

[–] robolemmy@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Nothing is accessible outside my network. The proxy is local only.

 

I'm using a docker compose file, and I have everything running just fine, containers talking to each other as needed, NPM reverse proxying everything via a duckdns subdomain... everything's cool.

Problem is, I can still go to, for example, http://192.168.1.30:8080/ and get the services without http.

I've tried commenting out the ports in the compose file, which should make them only available on the internal network, I thought. But when I do that, the containers can no longer connect to each other.

Any advice for me?

Edit:

Thanks for the quick & helpful suggestions!

While investigating bridge networks, I noticed a mention that containers could only find each other on the default container bridge by container name, which I did not know. I had tried 127.0.0.1, localhost, the external IP, hostnames, etc but not container names.

In the end, the solution was just to use container names when telling each container how to find the others. No need for creating bridge networks or any other shenanigans.

Thank you!

[–] robolemmy@lemmy.world 22 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

You have a slightly confusing typo in the title. I initially read it as “uninstalled” because you have “unstalled” in the title.

 

I like this one better than the more recent American version with Gere and Lopez.

 

I'm currently using an AMD 5950x and an Nvidia GeForce RTX 3080 LHR, pushing video to a Dell U4021QW, which is a 40" monitor running 5120x2160@60hz. A few of the games I play are pretty challenged at that resolution, so I'm thinking of upgrading at least the video card. Is there any reason to build a new system with a newer CPU as well?

 

Somebody said we needed more Nick Cave.

 

I have a lovely plex server set up and working very well, with tons of content ready to play. Now I just need a client for my TV that doesn't piss me off. I absolutely detest Google/Android TV, and my Apple TV periodically wipes out my Plex preferences, which is a known issue.

I'd like to have a 100% dedicated plex client for my TV. I don't want or need it to do anything else at all, and it has to be totally remote friendly and capable of playing 4k/60 UHD content.

Any suggestions?

view more: next ›