There's huge uncertainty on the timing of when it gets bad enough to be meaningful in Europe. Anywhere from 25 to 100 years is plausible, and whether it happens at all depends on human decisions about how much to extract and burn.
15
These Florida Communities Wanted to Be More Sustainable and Resilient. A New State Law Blocks Their Efforts.
(insideclimatenews.org)
17
‘It’s a road to destruction’: climate defenders facing surge in reprisals, says UN expert
(www.theguardian.com)
316
Portland cyclists strip down in pouring rain to protest ICE facility and Trump troop deployment
(www.oregonlive.com)
Yeah, was out canvassing for Yes on 50 in California and that was a common concern among voters. The ICE raids where they sweep people up based on how they look makes people furious
Nah. They're going to make it impossible for nonwhites to vote, so that Republicans can still win in Georgia.
If there's an edit that alters a detail that doesn't matter to the witness, it probably isn't important. And that kind of replacement is hard to do at scale without getting caught.
Here is a gift link you can edit into the top level post to make access free for the main link
What you end up stuck doing is deciding to trust particular sources. This makes it a lot harder to establish a shared reality
They're not idiots; they know who paid their bribe
Obvious, but the fossil fuels industry has a long history of investing just enough in renewables to try to present themselves as the solution
Some, but batteries are a lot cheaper and scaling up in a way that solar thermal never did
Tibetan Plateau, about 14,000 feet
Yeah, the US media landscape is full of stuff like this. I usually try to avoid them when I can find other coverage
view more: next ›
Making the idea that the city is a violent hellhole look absurd in a way that gets a lot of attention.