Why not both? We need to be hitting the road running from as many angles as we can to get people mobilized.
the_elder
joined 6 months ago
Yeah none of the studies linked put animal ag over 17% of global emissions, while it provides the majority of protein to the global populace. Sanctioning the biggest polluters (e.g. big oil, chemical companies, etc) would be a far more effective means of reducing global pollution. That's not to say we can't reduce our consumption of animal protein - we absolutely should, IMO - but calling 17% tops the leading cause is a spurious argument.
I'm sure plantbasednews.org is a non-biased, reputable news source.
Bold claim. I'll tack onto that and say cats don't belong in cities.