ubergeek

joined 2 months ago
[–] ubergeek@lemmy.today 4 points 6 hours ago

I just usually keep my hair tied back with a rubber band, a head band, or under a bandana, if doing most anything but just sitting.

[–] ubergeek@lemmy.today 3 points 1 day ago

Nothing like the very highly reliable pharmaceutical "science" done in the US, amirite?

Its not like we ever had "science" come from the US that said an extremely powerful opioid wasn't addictive, amirite?

[–] ubergeek@lemmy.today 1 points 1 day ago

I suppose we'll need to worry about that, once we get a net positive output from a fusion reactor.

[–] ubergeek@lemmy.today 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yeah, I'm not going to bother with a source from a capitalist... Sorry. I'll just go with the facts: The US was pretty much the only ones who could rebuild Europe... Eveyrone else had their entire industries flattened.

It wasn't about cutting taxes. It was about "Unleashing the market"... Those are oligarch talking points, to try and convince us to let them be Robber Barons again.

[–] ubergeek@lemmy.today 3 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Pretty sure all of Europe needing to be rebuilt, and the US having the only working industrial sector had a huge thing to with it...

Not slashing taxes... taxes were at their highest in the 60s.

[–] ubergeek@lemmy.today 3 points 1 day ago (5 children)

If we go back to the Great Depression, just creating jobs didn’t fix the economy, my understanding is that gold inflows (we were still on the gold standard) largely did, because it increased money supply, encouraging more investment

WW2 fixed the Great Depression...

[–] ubergeek@lemmy.today 5 points 1 day ago (7 children)

Since the economy is reasonably healthy (lowish unemployment, inflation under control, etc)

OMG... The economy ISN'T reasonably healthy...

Inflation is headed back up.

Houselessness in the US hit records highs, and still climbing.

Real income is still flat from 1980.

It turns out, when you flood the market with competent workers and your economy is otherwise healthy, they tend to get snapped up.

That... Not at all how it works. It ignores all sorts of things, like labor mobility. Remember the Great Depression? Loads of people, and loads of jobs out there... Labor was frozen, and immobile.

Right now, we have low unemployment, because people are holding 2 and 3 jobs just to meet basic needs... And are still falling behind.

https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2025/02/11/democrats-tricked-strong-economy-00203464

The economy is only doing "reasonably well" for oligarchs.

Additionally, slashing federal spending does... Reduce the GDP. Every federal dollar spent usually leads to 3-7 USD once it gets to the streets.

[–] ubergeek@lemmy.today 1 points 1 day ago

Well, the good news? A wider audience most certainly means a FLOSS suite that can parse the data from it. It doesn't seem very opaque, but more like Markup++.

[–] ubergeek@lemmy.today 6 points 1 day ago (9 children)

30k is a low end estimate. And 30k+ people in a single month WILL be more than a dent. So, take the 100-150, and revise back to 70-120K new jobs, which is below typical new job creation.

And this is JUST the first wave of effects... Those jobs created other jobs, down the line, which also are going away. Case in point: The 90 people in a single NPO that let everyone go. That is not unique, and not counted in the federal layoff count.

Just looked it up, the current count is 77,000 employees have been terminated, so far. So, that 100-150k gets revised downward to 30-70K new jobs... Almost cut it in half there! Its expected to increase, upwards of 200K. And, those all, once again, have downward effects on local govs and NPOS.

[–] ubergeek@lemmy.today 7 points 1 day ago (11 children)

I doubt we’ll see a depression unless Trump increases tariffs again in response like Hoover did.

Hoover wasn't ripping through the federal government, slashsing employee headcounts, and slashing outgoing funds.

These two alone, are likely enough to seal the "Depression" deal... Like, in 1 month, we have 30,000+ new people seeking unemployment; states, counties, and cities are going to start cutting jobs too, because of the slashed federal funds which fund programs at those levels. I know one non-profit that has basically let all 90 employees go, because lack of federal funds coming in on grants means they can't keep the rent paid.

[–] ubergeek@lemmy.today 19 points 1 day ago

Yeah no shit? Like anyone honest with themselves KNEW that would be the result if Trump won the presidency.

They should have been saying this BEFORE the election, instead of gargling the wrinkled, atrophied, and filthy balls of Trump.

[–] ubergeek@lemmy.today 11 points 1 day ago

I think it's telling that enemy and ally are closely matched...

Canadians likely have some nuance here... They don't hate "us" the people, they hate "us" the country.

 
 

This isn't my app, it just seems super cool as a way to pull together your own social media and news.

 
 
 

Its ok. We just need to build more luxury housing units, with tax payer dollars. I'm sure the affordable units will eventually trickle down to us all.

view more: next ›