this post was submitted on 16 Jan 2025
491 points (98.4% liked)

196

17019 readers
703 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

If you have any questions, feel free to contact us on our matrix channel.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] QuantumSparkles@sh.itjust.works 26 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I’d enjoy seeing a real ideological debate on the ethicality of sexualizing a cartoon teenage robot between intelligent and informed parties and whether or not said robot can even be considered “underaged”. I’m not taking a stance, I just want to watch other people do so

[–] tacosanonymous@lemm.ee 7 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I’d like to hope everyone agrees it's wrong. She had "the mind of a teenager" but I think she hadn’t had sentience that long. Maybe someday they’ll make robots take a test to see if they’re ready.

[–] reev@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

What about sexting an AI that was trained last year? Would it be different if it was considered sentient or not?

[–] tacosanonymous@lemm.ee 5 points 1 month ago

I think so. You can use tools however you want.

[–] QuantumSparkles@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Ready? Ready for what? To be fucked?

[–] tacosanonymous@lemm.ee 6 points 1 month ago

I was leaning toward consent but sure.

[–] HollowNaught@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I mean, at the root of it all, you've got to ask why paedophilia is wrong in the first place

Is it the individual's obsession with youth-like appearances or naivety? Not necessarily, as both of those things can fairly easily be emulated in older (legal) individuals

I'd argue it's wrong simply because of the impact you're having on the victim. You are effectively giving them ptsd for the rest of their life, destroying any childhood they may have left, even if consensual, as they can hardly be expected to understand what they're agreeing to

But a robot? Well, I don't know if this line of thought can even apply to them. On one hand, we don't know her actual age (I think); she may be entirely legal

On the other, if she can fully emulate a younger teen mind, then how is raping her any different from raping a human?

Can you even consider them equivalent, when you can wipe her entire memory?

Can you even quantify her age?

Questions for later