this post was submitted on 06 Feb 2025
23 points (87.1% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5831 readers
657 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world. About 1C of total warming. Second chart: about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability. Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases. About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
silence7@slrpnk.net
23
Why personal climate action matters – according to experts (theconversation.com)
submitted 2 weeks ago by SteveKLord@slrpnk.net to c/climate@slrpnk.net
10 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Your choices do not exist in a vacuum. Earth is an interconnected community of living and non-living things says ethicist Patrick Effiong Ben of the University of Manchester. African philosophers like Jonathan Chimakonam and Aïda Terblanché-Greeff have a helpful concept for thinking through the weightiness of your decisions: complementarity.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Flumpkin@slrpnk.net 1 points 2 weeks ago

What we'd need to do is drastic reorganization of how we work and live and manufacture things. Things like:

  1. Ban advertising globally since it increases consumerism. Regulate long term guarantees and repairs and interchangeable parts
  2. Abolish all patents, in order to redesign the many thousands of industrial processes, legal hurdles have to be brushed away
  3. Make industrial meat production illegal
  4. Redesign cities to have all necessities within walking distance and no through traffic, similar to sovjiet style city planning
  5. Make climate change denial or obfuscating a crime like hate speech
  6. Nationalize all oil production

Of course, it's career suicide to seriously discuss those points. That's why we still get this inane babble from the "intellectuals".

The sad truth is we simply don't live in a reality that ever could have done anything about climate change. So it never even mattered if it was anthroprogenic or not. It was always like a physical impossibility, an economic-political impossibility.