this post was submitted on 10 Feb 2025
59 points (92.8% liked)

Technology

63134 readers
4511 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] deranger@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I don’t need wireless 1Gbps around town.

Lots of us live in areas with no broadband competition, more options is a good thing. I personally wouldn’t use wireless broadband but if they can bring prices down through competition I’m all for it.

[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 21 points 1 week ago (2 children)

The solution to which is broadband competition.

[–] wildbus8979@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 week ago (3 children)

No, actually the solution is broadband nationalisation.

[–] SomethingBurger@jlai.lu 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

I like nationalising industries, but here in France, privatizing France Telecom made Internet and phone prices much lower.

[–] wildbus8979@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 week ago

Only because it is highly regulated. The FAIs have to allow everyone access to the network. Free wouldn't exist if it wasn't for that.

[–] Valmond@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

A part is thanks to free (the company) refusing to oligopole up the prices.

[–] SomethingBurger@jlai.lu 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

True, but nothing was stopping the public company from lowering their prices and improving their service.

[–] Valmond@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

You mean in the like nineties?

But how could they fight against the state controlled monopoly making stuff like this !

Jk, fun times actually

[–] deegeese@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That’s just another monopoly. How much do you trust your government?

[–] wildbus8979@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I pay the cheapest electricity of all of the OECD, and rake in billions every year that is reinvested in society. Thank supply side Jesus for publically owned monopolies.

How's that competition going with the Texas grid? You people are so fucking brainwashed that you think the shareholders have your best interests at heart.

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world -3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You rake in billions every year...?

[–] wildbus8979@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago

Society does indeed. Hydro Quebec gives back something like $3B a year that is reinvested into various government services.

[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 1 points 1 week ago
[–] deranger@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Yeah, that’s why faster wireless broadband is a good thing. Some people do need 1Gbps wireless in town because they can cut the cord on the overpriced cable. Faster wireless means it’ll hold up under congestion better as well.

[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 2 points 1 week ago

Hmmm. I guess.