this post was submitted on 16 Feb 2025
54 points (93.5% liked)

Asklemmy

45245 readers
875 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๐Ÿ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Microsoft, apple, google, meta, amazon, tencent what was preventing them to buy twitter?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 74 points 6 days ago (7 children)

Even before musk bought it, it was a house of cards. At no point in it's history since it's creation has it EVER made money. It was ALWAYS a money loser. That's why they were trying to sell it in the first place. It had value, but nothing close to 43 BILLION dollars.

It was assumed to sell for a few hundred million before musk ran his mouth, and joked that he'd do it for 43 billion. Then he took the joke as far as signing legal paperwork, then bitched that he HAD to now buy it for his joke price of 43 billion.

And now you read daily how much money it's losing. Firstly because even if he paid a fair price for it, AND ran it perfectly, it would still be losing money. But he bought it for 43 BILLION dollars, and from day one publically harassed advertisers saying he doesn't need them.

Well, even under perfect conditions, the advertisers were the only thing keeping twitters losses pre-musk at a minimum. They were losing about 13 million a year since 2008. And now it was adding up.

But now you got advertisers to go fuck themself. And they leave. Then he alienates twitters at the time core leftist by....well existing. And now you got all these people leaving twitter in droves. So now, even for the advertisers that remain, twitters reach loses 40% of it's value. Which means advertisers aren't willing to pay old rates. Which means less revenue.

And all these other companies, before musk bought it, looked at an unprofitable social media site, then remembered how MySpace went, and thought ".......no."

[โ€“] 3dmvr@lemm.ee 3 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Twitter was developing the at protocol and bluesky, think they always saw it eventually dying and had bluesky as their backup

[โ€“] dustyData@lemmy.world 5 points 5 days ago

Bluesky was an EEE operation. Meant to kill federation by capturing users then forcing an instance monopoly. That's why it is federated on paper only. In practice no engineering was done to make it actually federated at all. Now they're far behind the Activity pub and mastodon, and the rest of the fediverse despite having much more investment.

load more comments (5 replies)