this post was submitted on 17 Feb 2025
783 points (92.3% liked)

Microblog Memes

6661 readers
2453 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
ReadyUser31@lemmy.world
aeronmelon@lemmy.world
783
No Way (lemmy.world)
submitted 5 days ago by homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world to c/microblogmemes@lemmy.world
224 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] almost1337@lemm.ee 13 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Abnormal Clustering: In contrast to Election Day voting, Early Vote results display an unusual pattern: once approximately 250 ballots have been processed a visible shift is observed, resulting in a high degree of clustering and unusual uniformity. This is a departure from expected human voting behavior.

This is not logically explained by an "abnormal election".

[โ€“] TranscendentalEmpire@lemm.ee 8 points 5 days ago

It's also not really explaining much either. They don't give examples of other elections to compare it too, and their own methodology is lackluster.

They are basically saying that after approx 250 votes trump started to pull ahead, which is to be expected as a lot of early Dem voters were mail ins.

To be honest it just seems like they are trying to purposely confuse normal phenomena with statistical diction, and alluding to claims without providing context.

Usually when making claims this grand you would also want evidence to match it. You'd also want to provide an example to compare it to previous elections utilizing the same methodology.