this post was submitted on 28 Feb 2025
798 points (99.4% liked)

Programmer Humor

20829 readers
1774 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] danc4498@lemmy.world 7 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

Neither a company nor a person can own a factory, or a farm, or the power grid

And who is going to stop a company from owning a factory or a farm? It wouldn’t even require violence for a company to do so. It just requires them to have enough resources to pay people to do it.

I guess I don’t see what you call “anarchy” as a system that would ever exist more than a year. The end result would always be “anarcho-capitalism”. That, or, people would have to form their own government to prevent that system.

[–] 10001110101@lemm.ee 10 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

The company would need violence. There's no reason for workers to work in a factory for less money than their goods are sold for, and there's no reason for the company to pay workers more than the goods are sold for. Without violence the workers could just produce and sell the goods themselves and ignore the company.

[–] danc4498@lemmy.world 5 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Is this a society without computers and other modern day electronics? Or do you think workers will be able to handle developing technology on their own?

[–] 10001110101@lemm.ee 6 points 13 hours ago

Well, it's unlikely the entire world will turn anarchist all at once, and the modern supply chain is global, so the anarchist community would trade for what they need from outside the community. Or they may choose to go anarcho-primitivism I guess. I think some remote indigenous tribes we have now could be considered anarcho-primitivist. The most successful anarcho-socialist community would probably be the Zapatistas.

[–] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 1 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (1 children)

The factory helps make the goods though

[–] 10001110101@lemm.ee 3 points 9 hours ago

Yeah, that's what I mean, the workers could go in the factory, produce the goods, and sell them, if the company did not use violence. It's not clear where the factory came from in this hypothetical. The community could've built it, it could have been abandoned, or the company could've claimed they "owned" it (which is not possible in the society, so it would be seized).

[–] OccultIconoclast@reddthat.com 3 points 14 hours ago

The community. With hockey sticks.