this post was submitted on 03 Mar 2025
563 points (97.5% liked)

politics

20616 readers
3811 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Democrats must reclaim their identity as the party of the working class to regain electoral strength.

Despite pro-labor policies under Biden, working-class voters feel disconnected, seeing Democrats as defenders of a failing system.

The party’s decline traces back to NAFTA and neoliberal economic policies that favored corporations over workers.

A generational effort to prioritize labor rights, fair wages, and economic security while addressing working-class frustrations are needed.

Without serious reform, Democrats will continue losing ground to populist alternatives.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Boddhisatva@lemmy.world 137 points 1 day ago (15 children)

No shit. Now convince the democratic party leadership that winning elections is more important that kissing donor ass.

[–] ClassStruggle@lemmy.ml 13 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

Their goal is never to win elections. Their only goal is to prevent leftist movements and organization from gaining positions of power. To defend these status quo.

[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 1 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

Wouldn't be surprised if you are in a situation where it needs to get worse before it can get better. Vote 3rd party so heavily that it kills one of the major parties. All the people that didn't turn up vote for someone else?

[–] eestileib@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Yes they will gladly surrender to fascists to prevent socialists from getting a voice. This is the core issue

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 3 points 16 hours ago

Why are you using the future tense?

[–] MisterD@lemmy.ca 9 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

The best way is to bring single payer health care.

Every other G7 nation has it

[–] octopus_ink@lemmy.ml 61 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Now convince the democratic party leadership that serving their constituents is more important that kissing donor ass.

Convince them of that, and the winning elections thing will solve itself.

[–] ceenote@lemmy.world 33 points 1 day ago

The problem is "kissing donor ass" is a euphemism for serving themselves.

[–] Eldritch@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Don't convince national Democratic leadership of anything. They're too disconnected and don't care about any state they don't live in. Run for, and take control of state Democratic parties. Start telling national leadership your terms for your state supporting or working with them.

If enough people do that. They will change or become irrelevant.

[–] ClassStruggle@lemmy.ml 3 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

The only ones that get any level of power or influence within the party are ones that will defend the status quo. A system that's operating as designed cannot be reformed from within.

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world -2 points 19 hours ago

It's actually a pretty low bar to clear. You can even claim a decent annual wage off campaign donations if its your only income source, so a literal unemployed homeless person could run if he got the party endorsement.

The only concern is if the state has active politicians on the ticket that you would be competing against, such as career politicians, long time staffers, and volunteers who would be seen as more preferable. You could still fill one of those staffer, intern, and/or volunteer positions to make your voice heard as well.

[–] Sanctus@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Where can I sign up? Fuck it. I'll run for something.

[–] MegaUltraChicken@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

What state are you in? I will absolutely find you the info.

[–] Sanctus@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] MegaUltraChicken@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The state party has some resources here on volunteering and when the state committee meets for elections and whatnot.

You can go here and look at your county party website as well, they'll have more info on how to get involved/run there. I looked at a few, most of them had a way of singing up to be a committee person.

Best of luck!

[–] Sanctus@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

Should spread the word. I'll help. We should have been doing this 20 years ago.

[–] BadmanDan@lemmy.world -1 points 19 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Eldritch@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

Missouri. Not sure why you're being downvoted for asking that. We generally even in larger metropolitan areas have a ton of offices that no one other than Republicans run for. Which is part of why this is a red state. National Democrats don't even try to field candidates for anything but the biggest offices. Which often backfires denying them even those.

All states need to take back their leadership and a lot of the funding from the national party. The National Party should be nothing more than a body that coordinates the state parties. Not the actual leadership itself. That's part of the reason they seem so disconnected. Because they are

[–] RowRowRowYourBot@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 day ago (2 children)

The problem is they see large donors as the only path to victory as campaigns are expensive

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 24 points 1 day ago

The problem is that they see donations as the end goal and no longer give a shit if they lose.

[–] ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago (15 children)

They don't have to be. Present the people with policies that they want and the public will do all the work themselves.

load more comments (15 replies)
[–] WagyuSneakers@lemm.ee -2 points 20 hours ago

Losing is more expensive

load more comments (8 replies)