this post was submitted on 08 Mar 2025
1057 points (97.4% liked)

196

17163 readers
1835 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.


Rule: You must post before you leave.



Other rules

Behavior rules:

Posting rules:

NSFW: NSFW content is permitted but it must be tagged and have content warnings. Anything that doesn't adhere to this will be removed. Content warnings should be added like: [penis], [explicit description of sex]. Non-sexualized breasts of any gender are not considered inappropriate and therefore do not need to be blurred/tagged.

If you have any questions, feel free to contact us on our matrix channel or email.

Other 196's:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] fushuan@lemm.ee 29 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Getting the money over 20 years seems so stupid, it won't give you any interest and over 20 years just because of inflation it will be probably worse than 50% less...

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 6 points 16 hours ago

And yet at 40 million a year, I don't think inflation is going to bother you ever again. That's good advice for relatively small payouts like 10k, but at a certain point the annuity becomes an effectively unlimited credit line.

[–] bus_factor@lemmy.world 16 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

That depends entirely on how good you are at managing your money. With regular payments you'd still have a ridiculous amount of money even the first month, and no matter how badly you fuck up you're still rich 20 years from now.

[–] Ultraviolet@lemmy.world 1 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

Unless the government collapses in the next 20 years and can't pay it.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 12 points 16 hours ago

If the government collapses then your money is worthless anyways.

[–] bus_factor@lemmy.world 0 points 18 hours ago

Oh, there'll still be a government. But they may not be willing to ship his checks to the labor camp.

[–] crazyminner@lemmy.ml 25 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Plus, if the company goes out of business, you're fucked.

[–] H1jAcK@lemm.ee 19 points 1 day ago (1 children)

At least in my state, the lottery is run by the state government. The taxes from it go to schools.

[–] SARGE@startrek.website 25 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The taxes from it go to schools.

Dozens of people have gotten a chuckle out of this over the years. dozens!

[–] Boeman@lemm.ee 13 points 23 hours ago

I mean, the taxes from the lottery do. What that don’t tell us is the taxes originally earmarked for schools now go to something else.

[–] booly@sh.itjust.works 5 points 20 hours ago

The merits of lump sum versus annuity aside, the point is that the headline number comes from a naive total of how many payments are made in the annuity option. So when it's listed as a $2 billion jackpot, it's actually worth something closer to half of that as a lump sum.

[–] kautau@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yup, you’d be far better off doing doing the “buy, borrow, die” strategy and never paying taxes like other rich people

https://www.dcfpi.org/all/how-wealthy-households-use-a-buy-borrow-die-strategy-to-avoid-taxes-on-their-growing-fortunes/

[–] booly@sh.itjust.works 3 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

That wouldn't work to reduce lottery taxes. The lottery itself isn't return on investment in stocks or whatever, and can't be held indefinitely the way an appreciating stock can.

[–] kautau@lemmy.world 2 points 18 hours ago

Yeah I was referring to specifically taking a lump sum and what to do with it as opposed to taking the payment plan