this post was submitted on 12 Mar 2025
528 points (99.3% liked)

A Boring Dystopia

11124 readers
2082 users here now

Pictures, Videos, Articles showing just how boring it is to live in a dystopic society, or with signs of a dystopic society.

Rules (Subject to Change)

--Be a Decent Human Being

--Posting news articles: include the source name and exact title from article in your post title

--If a picture is just a screenshot of an article, link the article

--If a video's content isn't clear from title, write a short summary so people know what it's about.

--Posts must have something to do with the topic

--Zero tolerance for Racism/Sexism/Ableism/etc.

--No NSFW content

--Abide by the rules of lemmy.world

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] MooseyMoose@lemmy.world 39 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

Property damage is not violence against civilians.

[–] SaltSong@startrek.website -1 points 1 hour ago (2 children)

What if I blew up a water tower?

Or burned down every grocery store in the city? (At night, while no-one was there to get hurt)

[–] mako@lemmy.today 2 points 51 minutes ago (1 children)

Who is the intended audience of that comment that you believe will equate sources of food and water to swasticars?

[–] SaltSong@startrek.website 1 points 6 minutes ago

He didn't say "swasticars." He said "property." Property damage can absolutely be violence against civilians.

My audience would be anyone tempted to think that planting a burning cross in the yard of a black family does not count as violence against civilians, because it's just property damage.

[–] MooseyMoose@lemmy.world 1 points 41 minutes ago

Then your act of vandalism/sabotage would have effects that harms people. Is this so difficult for you to understand? SMH.

[–] red_bull_of_juarez@lemmy.dbzer0.com -4 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

Anything that's not the state is civilian. That includes civilian property. And I, too, cheer on violence against the oppressive class.

[–] MooseyMoose@lemmy.world 5 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

I don't consider property destruction "violence". Violence for me can only occur if there is a nervous system involved. Defining it otherwise seems a bit disingenuous, imo. Vandalism is not the same as an act against a person or animal.

[–] red_bull_of_juarez@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 44 minutes ago (1 children)

If I break into your home and trash the place, it's not violence? You should speak to people who experienced that. Granted, this is between real people and not corporations. And there is a line, somewhere, between vandalism and destruction where it turns to violence. It's compIicated. I just completely disagree with the statement that destruction of property is never violence.

[–] MooseyMoose@lemmy.world 1 points 36 minutes ago

They try to make it equivalent so they can classify people who smash windows in protest as "violent criminals" in order to increase the penalties which is a complete mischaracterization. If the act of vandalism has knock on effects then those are separate from the act itself and should be dealt with separately.

[–] HK65@sopuli.xyz 10 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Property is not people though.

Otherwise shorting companies would also be terrorism.

[–] SaltSong@startrek.website 1 points 6 minutes ago

Only if you're shorting them to further a political goal.