this post was submitted on 12 Mar 2025
727 points (97.9% liked)

News

27164 readers
6588 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] blakenong@lemmings.world 14 points 2 days ago (6 children)

Hospitals should be able to refuse patients who get diseases that are preventable with vaccines. Problem solved.

[–] IamSparticles@lemmy.zip 59 points 2 days ago (3 children)

No. For multiple reasons:

  • Vaccines are not 100% effective. They reduce the likelihood of infection if you are exposed. The whole point of trying to get everyone vaccinated is to reduce the infection rate so that there's less likely to be an outbreak. With a vaccinated population, the virus can't spread fast enough to maintain a pool of infected people to keep spreading it. But that doesn't mean nobody gets sick.
  • Vaccines are not as effective on some people. There's a range of effectiveness.
  • Not everyone can get vaccinated. People with certain allergies or compromised immune systems in particular.
  • Some parts of the population have higher risk factors than others and when they get sick it can be much more serious. Usually the very old and the very young. And again, people with compromised immune systems, or other conditions that complicate the illness.
  • Kids whose parents refuse to get them vaccinated are put at elevated risk through no fault of their own.

I could probably keep going, but hopefully you get the idea why that's just not a viable approach.

[–] biscuit@lemdro.id 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Everybody who gets vaccinated is documented as having gotten vaccinated, no?

So why can't hospitals check the record and confirm that patients have been vaccinated? If they have, then everything's fine. If they couldn't get vaccinated for legitimate reasons, that'd be documented too.

The point is to ensure as many people are vaccinated as possible, not to prove a point about the efficacy of vaccines.

That said, I dislike the idea of healthcare being able to pick and choose, for any reason, not to treat someone. Then again I live in a sane country with free healthcare.

[–] IamSparticles@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 day ago

That said, I dislike the idea of healthcare being able to pick and choose, for any reason, not to treat someone.

This is exactly the problem. Once you start talking about who does and does not deserve healthcare, you've gone to a place I refuse to follow. There is far too much nuance to start drawing lines in the sand.

[–] blakenong@lemmings.world -1 points 1 day ago (2 children)

If they have the vaccine and it doesn’t work, then fine. But if they refuse it without being one of the small groups of people with a diagnosed and documented reason to not get it, then they should stay home and tough it out.

[–] biscuit@lemdro.id 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's such a bizarrely American view to restrict people's access to healthcare... I guess the US will never get free healthcare if healthcare is still seen as a privilege and not a right.

[–] blakenong@lemmings.world 1 points 1 day ago

It has a lot to do with people being so loud about their opinions, and trying to force those opinions onto others. Then, becoming victims of their own stupidity and infecting others. It’s mentally exhausting to the point where the only thing that I want is leopards eating faces.

[–] lka1988@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] blakenong@lemmings.world 0 points 1 day ago

Which part? The part where your wife told you she was allergic based on zero actual evidence and when you got pressed on it you panicked and resorted to expletives?

🤡

[–] leisesprecher@feddit.org 36 points 2 days ago (2 children)

That's unfortunately an extremely slippery slope.

If vaccines (or lack thereof) are enough to refuse "service", why treat lung cancer in smokers? What about type 2 diabetes?

[–] blakenong@lemmings.world -2 points 1 day ago

Sure, those too. They can sue big tobacco and big sugar for the money to pay for those treatments.

[–] Artyom@lemm.ee -2 points 2 days ago (2 children)

According to this study, smoking costs our economy ~0.88% of our GDP. That works out to in the ballpark of $600 per capita. Would you change your opinion if you had $600 sitting in front of you? I disagree that it's a slippery slope, anti-vax, smokers, and overeaters cost a lot of money, and the rest of us foot the bill.

[–] BlindChina@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago

One of my children is not vaccinated against measles. In addition, although she is vaccinated against whooping cough, she in fact has had whooping cough. I talk about it a lot. You see my child has a compromised immune system and the measles vaccine is a live vaccine so giving her that vaccine could in fact kill her. And the dead vaccines are not terribly effective for her. The end result is I am very pro-vaccine because I rely on other people's vaccines to keep my child safe. But when a policy is put in place to deny those who are not vaccinated, it affects children like mine who simply can't be vaccinated. You can say well, those with medical exemptions can still get treatment. Except as soon as there's a medical exemption, all the anti-vaccine people jump in and claim a medical exemption, and then no one believes medical exemptions and children like mine are at risk. Even worse, some doctors may refuse to give medical exemptions thinking that everybody is lying in order to get an exemption.

Children do not choose whether or not to be vaccinated. So are you not going to treat an innocent 2-year-old because their parents are idiots? Do we put toddlers to death for the sins of their parents?

What about a family who can't vaccinate their 2-year-old because the grandmother lives with them and is immunocompromised once again measles is a live vaccine and you are not supposed to have it if anyone in the house is immunocompromised. So the child certainly can receive the vaccine and would not qualify for an exemption but it would endanger another person in the family.

The question is where do we draw the line? Who do we let die for poor choices? Just those who make the choices? Or their family members? What do we consider a poor choice? Is not vaccinating your child if it could kill your parent a poor choice? It's a hard choice, but is it a poor choice? I'd rather not play God and have absolutes.

I would love to see vaccine mandates put in place with all children required to get a vaccine unless a doctor says otherwise and leave that on the doctor's shoulders to make medical decisions. What I would not like to see is life and death decisions made based on our judgment call of whether someone is smart, or has made smart choices.

[–] leisesprecher@feddit.org 12 points 1 day ago

You might as well argue that healthy people are a drag since care in old age is so expensive.

See, I'm German. We have a solidarity based health insurance (mostly). I'm a young, reasonably healthy guy with a reasonably high income. All in all I pay 840€ every month (that's the maximum amount), even though I cost next to nothing. And I'm okay with that.

Yes, smoking is bad and I don't like smokers. But denying them healthcare is deeply deeply inhumane. And in Germany even unconstitutional.

[–] lka1988@sh.itjust.works 11 points 2 days ago (5 children)

And what about my wife? She's allergic to the measles vaccination.

[–] JaymesRS@literature.cafe 16 points 2 days ago (1 children)

That seems different than a refusal, no? That seems more like a medical incompatibility.

[–] lka1988@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

People use bullshit excuses all the time to avoid getting their kids vaccinated, including "allergies".

[–] 4am@lemm.ee 10 points 2 days ago (1 children)

"Allergies" are medically provable. Bullshit reasons are stuff like "sky daddy told me I don't hafta" and "the govmint can't 5g me"

[–] lka1988@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 days ago

That is certainly one extreme.

[–] shiroininja@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago

That’s a contrarian question, of course there would be loopholes for that.

[–] mattw3496@fedia.io 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I assume it would be documented and considered an exception

[–] lka1988@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

She lost the documentation years ago. We're almost 40.

[–] otp@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

You can either get the documentation reprinted, or get tested, no?

[–] lka1988@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 days ago

Yes, but it's just another thing on the pile of shit we're dealing with right now. The fact that she is a woman already doesn't bode well. We're just glad that we're both sterilized, all things considered...

[–] blakenong@lemmings.world -2 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] lka1988@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

And that right there is why your argument is complete bullshit.

[–] blakenong@lemmings.world 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] lka1988@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)
[–] blakenong@lemmings.world 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yeah, exactly. You’re making it up.

[–] lka1988@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I got nothing to prove to you, asswipe. It's people like you that makes it difficult for others to be taken seriously at the doctor's office. Fuck off and die.

[–] blarth@thelemmy.club 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Then she is also allergic to measles, because all it is is weakened measles itself.

[–] lka1988@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago

Yes, it's a shit situation.

[–] ryrybang@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Hospitals should be able to refuse RFK Jr and his immediate family.

[–] blakenong@lemmings.world 2 points 1 day ago

Can’t argue with that.

[–] SlopppyEngineer@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

They perhaps don't need to. The staff in hospitals only got a few token coins as reward for the previous pandemic, and didn't get much raise or better working conditions since then. People are already walking away because overworked and underpaid. It's likely a lot of them just quit when a new pandemic would start and the hospitals can barely function.

[–] blakenong@lemmings.world 0 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Nurses at the hospital my spouse works for get like 160k for a regular floor nurse working a day time shift. So, I dunno about them being paid “tokens” whomever told you that probably isn’t a nurse. Of course, the rate varies by city. Do they still have nurses in red states?

[–] Ledericas@lemm.ee 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

nurses can earn bank depending where they are, travelling nurses can make bank from what ive heard. i think doctors can make alot in some red states, depending on the specialty.

[–] blakenong@lemmings.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Travel nurses during Covid made unbelievable bank. I know one nurse who was working the system and pulled in almost 500k for two years by manipulating the overtime system. I can’t blame them, they are totally oblivious at the system level and definitely don’t promote talented managers.

It’s funny when I hear all that nonsense about nurses not making money, since I’m so close to it and know better. Sure, some places pay crap, but most metropolitan areas pay out big—or have ways to work it. The hospital I know the most about also is considered the worst in the state. It’s actually got a reputation where people go to die. There are so many deaths on the floor and no one does anything about it. Totally preventable too. Wrong meds, skipped meds, patients being ignored or totally forgotten. It’s a fucking mess.

[–] Ledericas@lemm.ee 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

i heard doctors made over a 1mill+ just flying into a desolate red area that drove all its doctor, he only needed to be there like 3 times a week.

nurses make as much as doctors, and even more in some cases. it made sense when i was in a retail job had a recently hired with me shopper, said he wanted to be a nurse. that last part, seems more like negligence and mismangment by the hospital or network. It was wierd how the nurse that has been in the news charged for someone elses death was in fact the hospitals fault for not staffing more nurses. i tried to get the CLS(for hospitals) but i found out required a grad school certification which i dont qualify, and i heard they made decent money 100k+, definitely not nurse level income though. instead i tried to pursue biotech.

[–] lka1988@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago

Bullshit, you made that up

[–] Ledericas@lemm.ee 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

apparently its more contagious than most viruses, they will probably to try to prevent them from going into the hospital

[–] blakenong@lemmings.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They’ll definitely want to put them in no contact rooms, but it’s not like those rooms are plentiful.

[–] Ledericas@lemm.ee 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

and ANti-maskers, distance, and vaxxer will throw a huge fit and fight the staff, like they did with covid, causing many to leave the industry.

[–] blakenong@lemmings.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I’ve actually met more anti-vax nurses than anti-vax non-nurses. Had one who was wearing a mask complain about being forced to wear a mask because she had not been vaccinated for ANYTHING! Jfc. I’m sure this is not the majority, but it’s pretty shocking how many medical professionals know squat about medicine.

[–] Ledericas@lemm.ee 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

i forgot how many nurses slip through the cracks. some areas, red states will waive certain parts of becoming a nurse because its such a big shortage, while others have more stringent regulations. nurses are the ones that assume they know everything because they got a a nursing degree.

[–] blakenong@lemmings.world 1 points 18 hours ago

It got pretty crazy when Covid hit and they just shoved nurses through the program. A lot of them got out and immediately made Covid bank, didn’t have to work, and are now freaking out that pay has gone back to normal, and people now have time to audit their performance. It is a pretty shitty situation for them though, hardly any of them got trained on the things they never got to learn in school. I heard one nurse managed to go two solid years without having to do an IV cause they never learned.