this post was submitted on 06 Apr 2025
796 points (99.0% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

6343 readers
580 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Access options:

Yes, this means a ton of carbon ends up in the atmosphere instead of in the trees. The right move would be thinning and prescribed burns, but this administration isn't going to do that.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml 88 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Uhm, why can he just decide this? Not part of his expertise or departement.

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Some national parks might be protected by legislation, such as the Yosemite Act of 1864, but massive amounts of land were protected by the executive branch such as Teddy Roosevelt protecting 150 Million Acres of forest and Joseph Biden protecting 674 Million Acres.

Then you also have Treaties with native americans which can be considered law if Republicans actually acknowledged them as such (they don't).

[–] suite403@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago

That our government has been reacting to his shit rather than controlling it is infuriating.

[–] johncandy1812@lemmy.ca 49 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Trump doesn't like that the US buys lumber from Canada. He's going to announce 34% tariffs on lumber from Canada in the next few days.

[–] rayyy@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Other than the Pacific northwest most U.S. forest trees do not make good building lumber.

[–] johncandy1812@lemmy.ca 3 points 21 hours ago

The rest is an assault on the natural world.

[–] stormdahl@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (2 children)

In addition to the blanket tariffs already announced? Seriously I think that guy might be an evil alien supervillain or something. He seems to be doing his best to ruin the world in any way he can.

[–] johncandy1812@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 day ago

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/us-hikes-softwood-lumber-duties-1.7503120

He's out to cripple Canada's economy, then he'll attempt to invade it. True evil.

[–] SabinStargem@lemmy.today 3 points 1 day ago

I honestly would prefer that. I don't want to think of Trump as a member of the human race. Plus, it would imply that the bad guys are actually competent. The Trump Regime isn't just evil, it is weaponized secondhand embarrassment.

[–] untorquer@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

National Forest Service is a part of the Department of Agriculture, part of the executive branch.

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml 2 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

Yeah, but he can decide that alone?

[–] MountainVeil@slrpnk.net 2 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

It's the goal of project 2025 that he is able to.

[–] untorquer@lemmy.world 6 points 22 hours ago

He appoints and directs the head of the department who, in turn, can more or less do so. They've been blatantly ignoring status quo and legal authority for a while now, so unless the supreme court gets the case and disagrees, they're unlikely to stop.