this post was submitted on 21 Apr 2025
1088 points (97.6% liked)

World News

46045 readers
3850 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] MudMan@fedia.io 413 points 2 days ago (25 children)

I am surpringly annoyed about Americans somehow finding a way to make this about themselves.

In reality I'm much more worried about the likely counterreformist pushback that is likely about to happen. We're about to find out if a remarkably powerful organization's leader was able to seed enough support to secure a politically aligned successor, and if the answer is "no" a bunch of organizations are about to get even more ruthlessly conservative at a time when a new strain of fascism is seeking moral support. The Catholic Church has been here before. It didn't go well.

[–] Wildfire0Straggler3@lemm.ee 232 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

"Francis appointed nearly 80% of the cardinal electors who will choose the next pope, increasing the possibility that his successor will continue his progressive policies, despite the strong pushback from traditionalists."

https://www.reuters.com/world/pope-francis-has-died-vatican-says-video-statement-2025-04-21/

[–] Microw@lemm.ee 84 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The catch is that he did not appoint by ideology. His appointments were mainly based on the guys doing work for poor people, for migrants, and on them doing their jobs in the global south.

Quite a few of these he made cardinals are somewhat conservative in their views, especially regarding sexuality

[–] Emtity_13@lemmy.sdf.org 25 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It helps a bit that typically those that have more compassion tend to be more liberal, but in general even the more liberal Catholics tend to be somewhat conservative

[–] Microw@lemm.ee 18 points 2 days ago

I mean, there are catholic priests and officials that are very liberal - they do exist. But those people do usually not even get into a position as a bishop, so they are not on the table to potentially become cardinals.

[–] philpo@feddit.org 109 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (5 children)

Yeah. It's more than annoying, especially as it's the same old Vance joke again and again and again. Which isn't even clever.

I am not a Christian by any means but I worked with them quite often. Francis did change a lot of things and while he wasn't in no way perfect - he did have his drawbacks, for a fucking pope he was much better than anyone before him within the last few hundred years. People (especially on the internet)nowadays expect other people, especially political leaders to "check all their boxes" and if one thing is not going as far as they want, they are alienated.

Often I have the impression that as long as someone is not going "all the way" in the right direction they are seen as bad as someone who does not do anything at all or goes in the wrong direction. (Which is ironic because the church itself has evolved past the "saint or sinner" directive)

Francis has been going in the right direction probably 60% of the way and 10% in the wrong direction. Is the Catholic church there yet? No. Is there a big chance it might turn back? Yes. Would he been elected if he was so reformist it was sure he would topple everything and go 100%? Surely not.

But he did much more than any of his predecessors did.

Any much more most commenters do.

Besides: It's okay to feel sorry for an old man dying. That's called fucking compassion. I work in healthcare and have seen a lot of people die. I feel sorry for almost all of them.

In the end a human has died. Period.

[–] Prandom_returns@lemm.ee 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'm entitled to not feel sorry for the unelected ruling class dying. Whether it's the queen, or it's the pope.

Both brought more misery than did good. The existance of them both were a net negative to the world.

Fuck the church.

[–] blujan@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 day ago

The pope is elected in his country

[–] r_deckard@lemmy.world 16 points 2 days ago (1 children)

much better than anyone before him within the last few hundred years

John XXIII was pretty progressive, wouldn't you think?

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago

So progressive there's an anti Vatican II movement in America

[–] barneypiccolo@lemm.ee 6 points 2 days ago

I don't feel that sorry when an old person dies, they've lived their life, and dying is a natural part of the cycle. I do feel bad for those they left behind, who will miss them dearly.

I feel worst for young people who die before their time, and never got to experience the life they planned for, that's a true tragedy.

[–] barneypiccolo@lemm.ee -1 points 2 days ago

Great post. Holding the leash on the next Pope would be a huge strategic coup for the MAGA Nazis, and too much of a temptation to resist. There are no coincidences in politics, and dropping dead immediately after Couchfucker's visit is to close to not be suspicious.

I expect a full court press by the MAGA Nazis to have their hand-picked creep as the next Pope, and they will make all sorts of threats to accomplish it. In the end, if the Vatican chooses someone other than the MAGA Nazi candidate, Catholics will suddenly become one more persecuted political democraphic in America.

[–] garfaagel@sh.itjust.works 42 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I don't expect a conservative backlash, on the contrary Francis's Pontificate has weakened the conservative wing considerably. Given that 80% of the voting cardinals were appointed by Pope Francis, I would expect them to elect a successor that continues in the same direction, perhaps even a more radical one.

During his pontificate Francis also made a lot of efforts to bring in new groups into the corridors of power. Not only by his appointment of cardinals, but also e.g. by reforming the Curia with Praedicate evangelium.

[–] MudMan@fedia.io 7 points 2 days ago

Compared to the iron grip the reactionaries held before my understanding is you're right. That doesn't mean that wing is going to get away with a continuist choice. I mean, it's more likely than it used to be, but I'm not making a call until the Habemus Papam.

[–] oppy1984@lemm.ee 26 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

As a non-Catholic American, I have the same worry for the global geopolitics. It just so happens that the united states is part of those geopolitics.

[–] venusaur@lemmy.world 25 points 2 days ago (4 children)

It sure feels like the tides are turning conservative everywhere, but apparently a Filipino progressive is a favorite to be next

[–] MudMan@fedia.io 15 points 2 days ago

We'll see where it goes. They aren't exactly transparent about these things, and they've been arguing among themselves for a while. We'll know with the white smoke, I suppose.

[–] Microw@lemm.ee 10 points 2 days ago (4 children)

There is a roman saying, "the one who enters conclave as the pope [to be] leaves it as a mere cardinal"

[–] venusaur@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Bummer. Then I guess it’ll be another Italian.

[–] CmdrShepard42@lemm.ee 7 points 2 days ago (4 children)

There's an old saying in Tennessee — I know it's in Texas, probably in Tennessee — that says, fool me once, shame on — shame on you. Fool me — you can't get fooled again.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] barneypiccolo@lemm.ee 3 points 2 days ago

I'm not Catholic, and i don't follow this stuff closely, but I've seen a LOT of popes come and go, and as far as I remember, the chosen pope has NEVER been the early favorite. Anybody whose name is being knocked around right now is unlikely to be the final choice, recently-historically speaking.

[–] sudneo@lemm.ee 2 points 2 days ago

A very old one indeed. It's never certain how conclaves will go.

[–] Saleh@feddit.org 7 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

I think in terms of the church the term "conservative" does not necessarily align with the political understanding. The largest shift in the church is demographic. White Europeans are loosing power rapidly in the catholic church. Subsequently the catholic church will align less and less with "Western" conservatives, and their imperialist understanding of geopolitics.

I expect to see much more opposition of "christian conservative" politicians in Europe towards the catholic church.
Ironically just yesterday the president of the German federal parliament of the "christian conservative" CDU told the Churches to shut up about politics.

[–] Miaou@jlai.lu 2 points 2 days ago (2 children)

It is not ironic, half of Germans are protestants.

Nope. Half of Germans (47%) don't have a confession. 21% of Germans are protestants.

[–] Saleh@feddit.org 3 points 2 days ago

She is describing herself as catholic though and even studied catholic theology.Her attack was directed at all churches, not just the catholic church.

More specifically she said "the churches shouldn't be another NGO" and then gave examples as to what they shouldn't talk about. So the idea is already that "NGO"s are something bad and civil society voicing political stances is bad. But then religious institutions commenting on how politics are in violation of the values the religion teaches, seems to be particularly disdained. This is also historically worrisome as the churches in the GDR used to be hailed for taking a stance against the regime and there is a lot of stories, how the churches in the third Reich would have taken stance, although i am not sure if the ratio of opposition/silence/collaboration is accurately represented in those stories.

[–] barneypiccolo@lemm.ee 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I'm waiting for someone to suggest that a it's time for the first woman pope.

[–] venusaur@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Haha I was thinking that, but there’s no way. And that’s a problem

[–] higgsboson@dubvee.org 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I am surpringly annoyed about Americans somehow finding a way to make this about themselves

Me too, bud. Me. Too. Alas, there is no escaping them for me. I do wish more Americans could travel abroad and see the world beyond our borders. I would wager fewer than 20% of Americans have been 50 miles from our borders and it can lead to a pretty insular world view.

[–] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Should we make it about a religion that's known for pedophile priests and them being protected? Or about how religion is a long con scam of power and wealth that has been the leading cause of war and persecution for centuries upon centuries?

Granted, by all appearances, I believe he seemed to be a pretty good guy. Hopefully the next pope will be as good. Take what you can while religions still exist, I suppose.

[–] MudMan@fedia.io 14 points 2 days ago

Yes.

Yes, you should.

Because as much as you see it as a domestic throwaway denomination among many, they are extremely and increasingly overrepresented in developing countries (and a couple of European ones as well).

So if you want to know which way the use of contraceptives, the position on gay people or the express support for neofascism is going to go in Africa this is relevant.

It is not about the US or their opinions. And I say this as an atheist.

load more comments (18 replies)