this post was submitted on 04 May 2025
828 points (97.8% liked)

Science Memes

14462 readers
3264 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Prunebutt@slrpnk.net 110 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (4 children)

While I don't want to spoil the joke (but I will) and I hate techno-optimist solutions that displace actual solutions for our biosphere as much as the next person: supposedly, Belgrade is such a dense concrete hell that trees aren't viable solution (at least in the short term).

There is some rumbling that liquid trees are not the solution to the real problems caused by large-scale deforestation, nor does it reduce erosion or enrich the soil. However, much of this wrath is misplaced as Liquid tree designers say that it was not made as a replacement for trees but was designed to work in areas where growing trees would be non-viable. Initiatives like Trillion Trees are laudable, but there is something to be said for the true utility of this tiny bioreactor. The fact that they can capture useful amounts of carbon dioxide from day one is another benefit for them. Such bioreactors are expected to become widespread in urban areas around the world as the planet battles rising carbon levels in the atmosphere.

Source

[–] zea_64@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 6 hours ago

They seem to be focusing on CO2. Trees in cities are going to capture a negligible amount of CO2 and for relatively high cost versus doing things outside a city. The point of trees in cities is shade and looking nice (good for mental health). Liquid trees solve neither of those.

[–] ThunderWhiskers@lemmy.world 5 points 6 hours ago

Also, trees are surprisingly difficult to keep alive if they were artificially introduced to a location. Turns out they don't thrive in a concrete hellscape super well.

[–] tostiman@sh.itjust.works 46 points 11 hours ago

They can thrive in tap water and can withstand temperature extremes.

So maybe they can be used in regions that are too hot for trees, like desert cities

[–] kameecoding@lemmy.world 11 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

And for people who think that the trillion tree idea is anything else than just the oil lobby running with a feel good solution, I have a great podcast episode for you

https://open.spotify.com/episode/3AZIvnCFvavc9Qfs10XPxW

[–] Prunebutt@slrpnk.net 15 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (2 children)

Spotify doesn't work on my phone. Care to link the podcast page on a platform not trying to corner the market, please?

[–] kameecoding@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

I listen to it on apple podcasts if that helps

[–] Prunebutt@slrpnk.net 4 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

How, if I can't find out which podcast it is?

[–] kameecoding@lemmy.world -3 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

You can click the spotify link and it literally tells you what it is

[–] Prunebutt@slrpnk.net 3 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

I already said thatspotify doesn't work on my phone (the homepage crashes)

[–] monotremata@lemmy.ca 3 points 3 hours ago

It's an episode of "The Climate Denier's Playbook" entitled "Let's Just Plant a Trillion Trees."