this post was submitted on 07 May 2025
463 points (98.7% liked)

politics

23371 readers
3308 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

With Trump’s help, Republicans across the country are sowing doubt about next year’s congressional elections—and gearing up for 2028.

Special elections in Florida and Wisconsin have suggested that voters are already fed up with the Trump administration and point to the possibility that the 2026 midterms could be a blue wave. As Trump’s failures continue to mount, Republicans have good reason to fear a backlash.

Perhaps this explains why Trump is intent on bolstering the election denial movement, which has lately notched a number of key victories. On March 25, the president signed Executive Order #14248, “Preserving and Protecting the Integrity of American Elections,” which neither preserves nor protects our elections but rather undermines them.

It is a clarion call to Republicans throughout the nation, who are being encouraged to question the legitimacy of any election loss and ultimately establish a permanent electoral advantage by challenging and removing eligible voters from the rolls. Now, with Trump’s executive order, they have insurance: a way of tipping elections in their favor by choosing the voters rather than having the voters choose them.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 57 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

Be suspicious of anyone who tells you that voting is going to solve this problem. They aren't going to let you vote them out of power.

By all means, vote if you can! But if the only thing you do is vote, you will lose.

[–] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If they let us vote again then we might as well do it, but at the rate things are going they might just rig the election if they don't cancel it.

[–] Zenith@lemm.ee 2 points 23 hours ago

Or use it to keep track of who isn’t supporting the new regime and come after you. I’ve always been very pro-voting but it doesn’t feel safe to be voting anymore and I’m not going to risk my safety for a rigged election

[–] rational_lib@lemmy.world 1 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (2 children)

Voting caused the problem, it can solve it too. But here's the thing: for voting to solve the problem, you have to actually do it and play the game.

Every 20-25 years some rightwing psycho wins and inflicts some horror on us because new voters don't remember what happened the last time people said "both sides are the same". You kids know that whole Iraq war and torture thing was avoidable, right? So was Reagan's annihilation of the middle class.

[–] eldavi@lemmy.ml 5 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

this overly simplistic and completely ignores the impact of things like voter suppression or propaganda or narrative control

[–] rational_lib@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

Well yeah, but part of the voter propaganda is telling people both sides are the same. I get that there's pro capitalist media bias which at its root is caused by extreme financial inequality. But fixing that financial inequality requires government action, and that requires voting. For the people who will do the inadequate version over the people who want to make it worse. Incremental change through pressure + time, just like everything else on earth.

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 2 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Bush was forced onto us by the Supreme Court in a judicial coup that basically set us on our current trajectory. Trump has never won more than 50% of the vote, even this time around he only got 49.9%

In a democratic country this shit wouldn't happen. Elections have always been dubiously free and fair in this shithole.

I'm in my 30s, hardly a kid. I've watched this shithole country get worse and worse my whole life, and I am beyond convinced that we will only stop it with political actions that go far beyond the ballot box. You're going to have to get your hands dirty.

If we're allowed to vote for the next president you might as well, I know I will, but stop pretending it is nearly good enough.

[–] rational_lib@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (1 children)

There's definitely giant inadequacies in American democracy, but still I fail to see how voting isn't good enough. If people voted for Gore instead of Nader, American history would be very different. We'd have avoided a giant tax cut for the rich l, withdrawing from Kyoto, and a trillion dollar unnecessary war. Wealth inequality wouldn't be as bad, there would definitely be earlier progress against global warming, and we could probably afford real universal health care by now.

Ideally after voting in the right people, we'd fix all the democracy problems. But still I'd say voting alone would make a huge difference. Anything else meanwhile - protests (BLM, Gaza), violence (Matthew crooks, Luigi) has at best accomplished zero, and in reality seems to have done serious damage to the causes they were seeking. The one exception I'd give is boycotts - like the Tesla boycotts that have destroyed their sales numbers.

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 1 points 26 minutes ago

If people voted for Gore instead of Nader, American history would be very different.

People did vote for Gore. Their votes were invalidated by the Supreme Court. The election was stolen.

Playing with historical counterfactuals is pointless anyway. Voting is over. They aren't going to let us vote them out of power anymore. The elections will either be canceled or rigged.

It's time to do something else.

protests (BLM, Gaza), violence (Matthew crooks, Luigi) has at best accomplished zero,

We need organized labor actions. We run this country and we can shut it down. That's how we got the New Deal.

The one exception I’d give is boycotts - like the Tesla boycotts that have destroyed their sales numbers.

Don't forget the vandalism and arsons. There's more than one way to hurt a business.

[–] Binky@lemmy.sdf.org 6 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

My hope is that congress gets huge wins (despite the very expected interference from the GOP.) A Dem congress should absolutely clog the system and start the battles that this FUCKING inept GOP congress should be doing.

Trump is overreaching for power that belongs to congress and is ignoring the judicial branch. Someone has got to rein him in or we won’t make it to 2029.

[–] OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca 5 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Look at the Dem voting pattern in the past few months. They're part of the problem. They won't save you.

[–] Binky@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

If that’s true, nothing will. We need not only Dems, but independents and GOP voters that realize they’ve been swindled.

[–] OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca 2 points 22 hours ago

Exactly. The public needs to be in support of this. Relying on Dems will not help. They are not on your side either.

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 1 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

Voting won't save you.

Voting also isn't the only option.

Recall that there are four boxes of liberty.

[–] _core@sh.itjust.works 1 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

I know ballot box, soap box, and ammo box. Is the fourth one a coffin box?

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 2 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

You forgot the jury box i.e. jury nullification

"Eyy what murders? I didn't see no murder. Brian Thompson just fell on some bullets."

[–] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 1 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

There's a saying about the western front of WW2, "The war was won with Soviet blood, British intelligence, and American steel" though over simplifying the whole affair and the contribution of the Czechs, Poles, Norwegians, Danes, Belgian, etcetera the point is still broadly true. I say this to point out that the destruction of fascists is a multifaceted operation and that decrying the use of a tool no matter how small is foolish.

Ideally we will be able to vote them out and then get to lynching the sons of bitches, but only using two tools is unlikely. But well as Cincinnatus once said "Hope for peace, Prepare for war".

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 1 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

I think that saying is just the British patting themselves on the back. It was mostly just Soviet blood that liberated the camps.

[–] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 1 points 14 hours ago

It ain't British Intelligence was fucking nuts and after awhile just devolved into trolling the Axis because they were that far ahead. Same thing with American war materials it gave both the Soviets and British enough slack to focus on what was wanted rather than what was needed, without M3 Lees the British may not have had enough tanks for North Africa and without the M3 Trucks the Soviets would've wasted materials building trucks rather than tanks.

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 4 points 22 hours ago (1 children)
[–] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 2 points 17 hours ago

The point of a speed bump is to slow the car down and fuck up the underside if they don't. Same applies here