TechTakes

1837 readers

387 users here now

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here's the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

dgerard@awful.systems

732

AI computers aren’t selling because users don’t care (pivot-to-ai.com)

submitted 2 days ago by dgerard@awful.systems to c/techtakes@awful.systems

284 comments fedilink hide all child comments

video version

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Dragonstaff@leminal.space 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Same issue from when we had turbo buttons: why have a button for something you don't turn off?

[–] froztbyte@awful.systems 7 points 1 day ago (2 children)

your comment demonstrates a remarkable lack of imagination

[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 6 points 23 hours ago

Better option: An array of flip switches for throttling to different speeds.

Best option: Mount these flip switches above you on an overhead control panel.

[–] Hexarei@programming.dev 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

And a clear lack of understanding of what the turbo button actually did

[–] sem@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

I thought it makes the game tick faster or slower, such that you have to have it set correctly or it's unplayable.

[–] toddestan@lemm.ee 3 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

Some early PC software, mostly games, were written expecting the computer ran at a fixed speed which was the speed of the original IBM PC which used an Intel 8088 that ran at 4.77 MHz. If the IBM PC was more like computers such as the Commodore 64 which changed little during its production run, that would have been fine. But eventually faster PC's were released that ran on 286, 386, 486, etc. CPUs that were considerably faster and hence software that expected the original IBM PC hardware ran way too fast.

The turbo button was a bit of a misnomer since you would normally have it on and leave it on, only turning it off as sort of a compatibility mode to run older software. How effective it was varied quite a bit - some computers turning it off would get you pretty close to the original IBM PC in terms of speed, but others would just slow the computer down, but not nearly enough, making it mostly useless for what it was intended for.

[–] Hexarei@programming.dev 4 points 14 hours ago

Kind of, though it's about the CPU's clock speed rather than the details of the game.

So, pedantically? no.

Experientially? yes.