this post was submitted on 07 Jun 2025
488 points (98.8% liked)

Technology

71223 readers
4058 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
technopagan@lemmy.world
L4s@lemmy.world
L3s@hackingne.ws
L4s@hackingne.ws
488
Microsoft’s Recall feature is still threat to privacy despite recent tweaks (adguard.com)
submitted 3 days ago by Pro@programming.dev to c/technology@lemmy.world
91 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] PirateFrog@lemmy.dbzer0.com 76 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

The worst thing about it is, even if you switch to Linux for privacy yourself, you'll also need your friends to switch as well, otherwise if you message them on their desktop, they're a liability, as the damn recall will be there too, leaking your data.

It'll be hell for activists.

[–] Blemgo@lemmy.world 47 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (3 children)

Funnily enough, Signal has circumvented the issue by marking their chat window as DRM content, making it invisible to Recall.

[–] Initiateofthevoid@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 2 days ago

They used the invasion of privacy to destroy the invasion of privacy?

[–] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 1 points 2 days ago

They didn’t circumvent the issue - they did what Microsoft tell developers to do in regards to their programs and recall lol.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 9 points 3 days ago (1 children)

The same has been true of email for years, but less bad. Activists will need to be even more careful in who they trust.

[–] RobotZap10000@feddit.nl 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

In what sense?

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 days ago
  • if you send plaintext, their email service could spy on them
  • once they decrypt, they could accidentally reply with the decryped text, or it could get backed up if they store a copy somewhere
  • screen readers could store decrypted email

In general, if you don't trust the receiver, you shouldn't send sensitive information. Windows Recall doesn't change that, if they're competent, Windows Recall won't be enabled.

I think this is more an issue for less technical users instead of activists, because activists will be more careful about who they trust than a secretary or something for a powerful individual.