Funny

10704 readers

742 users here now

General rules:

Be kind.
All posts must make an attempt to be funny.
Obey the general sh.itjust.works instance rules.
No politics or political figures. There are plenty of other politics communities to choose from.
Don't post anything grotesque or potentially illegal. Examples include pornography, gore, animal cruelty, inappropriate jokes involving kids, etc.

Exceptions may be made at the discretion of the mods.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

TheDude@sh.itjust.works

kersploosh@sh.itjust.works

example@reddthat.com

VicksVaporBBQrub@sh.itjust.works

200

Impeccable logic (lemmy.ml)

submitted 3 weeks ago by cm0002@lemmy.world to c/funny@sh.itjust.works

30 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Venus_Ziegenfalle@feddit.org 35 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

You've certainly made a great observation there! Let's break down why AI could be tricky to spot:

AI language models generate speech based on samples that were thought up by real humans
AI as well as non-AI images on a digital medium are typically made from pixels

I hope this summary can be of assistance. Is there anything else I can help you with?

[–] TempermentalAnomaly@lemmy.world 13 points 3 weeks ago

That comment makes an interesting point about how the line between human and AI contributions gets blurry, especially when both are shaped by human-created samples and digital pixels. Do you think the ability to distinguish between AI and human content matters—say, in art or writing—or is the impact more about how the content is used?