this post was submitted on 22 Jun 2025
480 points (99.0% liked)

Programming

21127 readers
282 users here now

Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!

Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.

Hope you enjoy the instance!

Rules

Rules

  • Follow the programming.dev instance rules
  • Keep content related to programming in some way
  • If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos

Wormhole

Follow the wormhole through a path of communities !webdev@programming.dev



founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ulterno@programming.dev 14 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Never have I had to implement any kind of ridiculous algorithm to pass tests with huge amounts of data in the least amount of memory, as the competitive websites show.

It has been mostly about:

  • Finding the correct library for a job and understanding it well, to prevent footguns and blocking future features
  • Design patterns for better build times
  • Making sane UI options and deciding resource alloc/dealloc points that would match user interaction expectations
  • cmake

But then again, I haven't worked in FinTech or Big Data companies, neither have I made an SQL server.

[–] magikmw@lemm.ee 7 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Because actually writing code is the least important part of programming.

[–] rikudou@lemmings.world 6 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I mean, not the least important, it is an important part. But way less than a common person thinks.

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Pretty sure that autocomplete would be terrible at these tasks too.

[–] ulterno@programming.dev 2 points 2 days ago

There are some times when I wish I were better at regexp and scripting.
Times when I am writing a similar kind of thing again and again, which is just different enough (and small enough number of repetitions) that it doesn't seem viable to make the script.

At those times, I tend to think - maybe Cursor would have done this part well - but have no real idea since I have never used it.

On the other hand, if I had a scripting endpoint from clang, ^[which would have taggified parts of code (in the same tone as "parts of speech") like functions declaration, return type, function name, type qualifier etc.], I would have used that to make a batch processor for even a repetition as small as 10 and wouldn't have thought once about AI.